ArticleBMC urology2024
The impact of constipation on lower urinary tract function and treatment response in patients with non-monosymptomatic enuresis.
Article in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the differences in lower urinary tract function and treatment response between non-monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (NMNE) pediatric patients with and without constipation.
methodWe retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients diagnosed as NMNE from our enuresis database. Inclusion criteria were children aged 5 years or older with a follow-up duration of at least one month. Basic evaluation included the Rome IV questionnaire, Dysfunctional voiding score questionnaire (DVSS), two-day voiding diary, one-week enuresis diary and uroflowmetry with post-void residual (PVR) measurement. Constipation was defined as a Rome IV score of ≥ 2. We compared the results of evaluations and treatment response between groups with and without constipation.
resultsFrom July 2005 to December 2021, we enrolled 128 children who met the diagnostic criteria for NMNE. The median age was 7 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 6-9), and the median follow-up duration was 8.6 months (IQR: 3.5-15.6). NMNE patients with constipation had significantly higher scores on the daytime incontinence, holding maneuver, urgency, and total scores of the DVSS questionnaire. No significant differences were found between those with and without constipation in terms of daytime maximal voided volume and voiding frequency as recorded in the voiding diary. Although the group without constipation showed a relatively higher maximum flow rate, there was no significant difference observed in the PVR between the two groups. Patients in the constipation group exhibited a higher proportion requiring the combination of more medications for enuresis treatment. However, constipation did not affect the time to achieve partial or complete response in NMNE patients. The use of laxatives also did not affect the treatment response in the constipation group.
conclusionConstipation in NMNE patients is associated with increased severity of daytime lower urinary tract symptoms and requires more medications to achieve treatment response. However, with proper treatment, the time to partial or complete response is comparable to those without constipation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.