ArticleBMC nursing2024
Psychometric evaluation of Persian version of the oral presentation evaluation scale in nursing students.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Witness Perceived Safety Scale of prehospital emergency care.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses should possess the ability to deliver concise oral presentations. Strong oral presentation skills can improve the quality of nurse-client communication, enhance teamwork among healthcare professionals, and contribute to professional development, leadership, and promotion. This study aimed to determine psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the oral presentation evaluation scale in nursing students.
methodsThe study aimed to translate the oral presentation evaluation scale (OPES) into Persian using the standard translation and re-translation method. After the translation, the scale was distributed among 474 nursing students of various levels using the available sampling method. The scale's reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest repeatability. The construct validity was determined using the confirmatory factor analysis.
resultsThe Persian questionnaire consists of 15 items and is divided into three categories: accuracy of content, effective communication, and speech clarity. The overall score for the content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.94. The three-factor questionnaire's fitness indices were RMSEA = 0.070, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.96, goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.91, and adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) = 0.88. The intra-cluster correlation index (ICC) was 0.965, and Cronbach's alpha was 0.875.
conclusionThe study found that the 15-item oral presentation evaluation scale Persian Survey is reliable for assessing nursing students' oral presentation skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.