Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702054›Full record

Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2024

Pericardial effusion in an Indian context: clinical insights and dynamics from a tertiary care centre.

Nafeez Javed Shaik, Sindhu Sujeeth Hegde, Shubha Seshadri, Mounika Cherukuri

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nafeez Javed ShaikDepartment of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India.
Sindhu Sujeeth HegdeFaculty of General Medicine, Department of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India.
Shubha SeshadriKasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India.
Mounika CherukuriFaculty of General Medicine, Department of General Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India. mounika.cherukuri@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPericardial effusion (PE) indicates the build-up of fluid within the pericardial sac, which encases the heart. The present study was undertaken to assess the clinical profile, etiology of pericardial effusion and to determine the correlation of cardiac tamponade and constrictive pericarditis with etiology.

methodsA prospective observational hospital based longitudinal study was undertaken among the 88 newly diagnosed and known patients of pericardial effusion who are above 18 years. The clinical profile of pericardial effusion including history, examination, standard lab parameters routinely done including thyroid function tests, HIV Serology, ECG, Echocardiography and imaging if done (HRCT thorax), pericardial fluid analysis (if performed) were elicited.

resultsMajority of the patients were males (55.7%), with a mean age of 51.3 years. Among the 88 patients of pericardial effusion, 20 had cardiac tamponade, 13 individuals were diagnosed with constrictive pericarditis. Dyspnea was the most common presenting complaint (65.9%). Chronic kidney disease / uremia is the most common cause of pericardial effusion accounting for 25%, followed by neoplastic (20.5%) and tuberculosis (17%). While in cardiac tamponade patients neoplasm followed by tuberculosis were the most common etiology, patients with constrictive pericarditis had tuberculosis followed by chronic kidney disease as the most common etiology. Echocardiography features were not significantly different according to the etiology of the pericardial effusion (p > 0.05). Thickened pericardium found in the echocardiography showed maximum specificity (76.9%), while thickened fluid/exudates showed maximum sensitivity (65.2%) and negative predictive value (77.1%) for tuberculous pericardial effusion.

conclusionChronic kidney disease, closely followed by infections (mostly tuberculosis), are the frequent causes of PE in the present settings. Breathlessness is the most frequent clinical feature in the patients of PE. Fibrin strands, thickened pericardium, thickened fluid in Echocardiography assists in diagnosing tubercular pericardial effusion. Cardiomegaly in chest X-ray or CT scans should further prompt towards diagnosing pericardial effusion. It is essential to incorporate these findings into the clinical practice, by evaluating the patients presenting with breathlessness for PE. CKD needs to be placed on par with tuberculosis while suspecting the etiology of the PE in the present settings. ADA levels in pericardial fluid (> 40) can be considered as a specific marker for tubercular PE.

Indexed as

Cardiac TamponadePericardial EffusionPericarditis, ConstrictiveTertiary Care CentersAdultAgedDyspneaEchocardiographyFemaleHumansIndiaLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesCardiac tamponadeClinical featuresConstrictive pericarditisEtiologyIndiaPericardial effusion

Identifiers

PMID39702054
PMCPMC11658163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.