SynthesisBMC public health2024
Nickel and human sperm quality: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of Lifestyle Factors with Cadmium and Nickel in Seminal Fluid of Potential Sperm Donors.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- E-cigarettes and erectile dysfunction: biological mechanisms and research challenges.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Serum trace and heavy metal exposure and IVF/ICSI outcomes: modifying effects of maternal diet in a prospective cohort.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
- Exposure to ambient particulate matter and semen quality: the modifying role of socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors in chinese men.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReproductive effects of chronic exposure to nickel (Ni), including sperm quality, have been a matter of debate given that published studies yielded contrasting results. We have, therefore, planned to systematically search and analyze medical literature with the aim to ascertain the association of exposure to nickel with the sperm quality in humans. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe systematically searched Pubmed, Scopus and Embase for studies reporting the association of Ni with the sperm quality in humans with no time or language limits and used PRISMA to report the findings. The risk of bias was assessed using JBI critical appraisal checklist and SIGN tool. Because the reported effects were no coherent, meta-analysis was not possible.
resultsAll included studies were observational and planned to test the effect of a group of trace elements, but not Ni alone. We identified and included 19 studies from 23 publications, published from 12 countries, which assessed sperm quality, sperm DNA damage and sperm metabolome. Ni was quantified in blood, semen plasma, spermatozoa and urine. Sixteen included cross-sectional studies were of acceptable quality, whereas three more case-control reports were of poor quality. Multivariate models were reported in only eight studies. Overall, studies were inconsistent in the direction of effect, when elevated Ni was not associated with the outcome (N = 8 studies), or some association was present (N = 11 studies). In the latter, 9 studies yielded elevated risk and 2 studies exhibited protective effect. Only one report was in an occupationally exposed population with some association with tail defects, but present in both welders and controls.
conclusionsExisting evidence from the studies in humans is inconsistent and does not confirm a clear adverse effect of higher Ni concentrations in blood, urine or semen on the sperm quality. Robust methodology must be a key issue in the future studies. Studies with more powerful evidence, such as cohort or experimental reports are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.