Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702043›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Unveiling socioeconomic disparities in maternal smoking during pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis of rural and Appalachian areas in Virginia utilizing the multi-dimensional YOST index.

Asal Pilehvari, Ashley Chipoletti, Rebecca Krukowski, Melissa Little

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of prenatal self-report of tobacco use to direct measurement of umbilical cord cotinine.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asal PilehvariDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C Hunt Drive, Room 2107, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. Asal@virginia.edu.
Ashley ChipolettiSchool of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Rebecca KrukowskiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C Hunt Drive, Room 2107, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
Melissa LittleDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C Hunt Drive, Room 2107, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Dina Gould Halme · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
NIH Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA044579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal smoking during pregnancy carries significant health risks for both mothers and infants, especially in vulnerable regions like rural and Appalachian areas with high smoking rates. Understanding the causes of high smoking rates in vulnerable areas is crucial for designing effective interventions to promote smoking cessation and reduce preventable health disparities.

methodsData from the Virginia Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS; years 2009-2020) comprised of 7,861 women aged over 18 were used in this cross-sectional observational study. Pregnant individuals were categorized as smoking if they reported smoking during the last trimester. A multi-level logistic regression was employed to examine the association of individual sociodemographic factors, rurality, Appalachian status, and county socioeconomic status (SES) proxied by Yost Index quintiles with smoking behaviors during pregnancy. The county of residence was considered as a random factor in the analysis. Trend analysis were also conducted.

resultsOut of the overall sample, 92.8% (n = 7,292) were non-smokers, while 7.2% (n = 569) were smokers. The multi-level logistic regression analysis showed pregnant individuals aged 18-24 had 1.06 times higher odds of smoking compared to those over 35 (95% CI [1.02-1.10]). Those with a college education or higher had significantly reduced odds (OR: 0.10, 95% CI [0.10, 0.10]), as did racially minoritized individuals (OR: 0.59, 95% CI [0.51-0.68]) and Hispanic individuals (OR: 0.14, 95% CI [0.09-0.21]). Living in rural areas was associated with a 26% higher likelihood of smoking during pregnancy compared to urban areas (OR: 1.26, 95% CI [1.21-1.31]), while residing in Appalachian regions led to a 25% higher probability of smoking. Additionally, lower SES quintiles were linked to higher odds of smoking, with the lowest quintile at OR: 2.10 (95% CI [1.67-2.65]) and the second quintile at OR: 1.64 (95% CI [1.53-1.76]) as compared with the most affluent quintile. Trend analsysis shows smoking has declined across all quintiles, but a substantial gap persists between lowest and highest SES regions.

conclusionsSmoking rates during pregnancy have dropped overall but remain alarmingly high in specific rural and Appalachian areas. As smoking during pregnancy poses significant health risks, targeted interventions and resources for tobacco cessation programs are needed in these highly vulnerable regions.

trial registrationNot Applicable.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationSmokingAdolescentAdultAppalachian RegionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSocial ClassSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic FactorsVirginiaYoung AdultComposite socioeconomic indexPregnancy smokingRural areasTobacco cessationVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID39702043
PMCPMC11660882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.