ArticleBMC primary care2024
The role of family health centres in preventing paediatric emergency department usage of parents of children with non-urgent conditions.
Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leaving without being seen and against medical advice from the pediatric emergency department: a single-center retrospective cohort study in Türkiye.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Investigation of the satisfaction levels of patients visiting the emergency department.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Parents of Children Admitted to the Paediatric Emergency Department with Fever.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Driving factors in pediatric emergency department use: an ecological retrospective study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Beyond clinical urgency: parental awareness, educational level, and non-urgent pediatric emergency department utilization.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Identifying the needs of parents admitted to the paediatric emergency department.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Investigation of state anxiety levels of parents admitted to the paediatric emergency department.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOvercrowding in paediatric emergency departments (PEDs) has become a global public health issue, reducing healthcare quality, increasing dissatisfaction, and driving up costs. Overcrowding in PEDs not only affects patient satisfaction and healthcare costs but also can lead to burnout among healthcare professionals. This burnout could potentially result in suboptimal care for truly severe cases, ultimately increasing morbidity and mortality rates among patients requiring urgent attention. This study aims to determine how family health centres can reduce paediatric visits to PEDs and provide recommendations for alleviating overcrowding.
methodsThis study is a descriptive cross-sectional study. Participants were parents whose children were admitted to the PED at a tertiary hospital located in southeast Turkey. The data were collected between 15/05/2024-26/08/2024. This study was completed with 657 parents. A convenience sampling method was used to recruit participants. SPSS 11.5 software was used for data analysis.
resultsThe mean age of the parents and children brought to the PED was 31.99 ± 8.51 years and 4.20 ± 4.08 years, respectively. Of the children, 32.1% were admitted to the PED due to fever. Majority of parents (65%) visited the PED outside working hours. 8.8% of parents considered their child's health condition as "very urgent", 54.5% of them considered it as "urgent". The majority of parents thought that the PEDs were overcrowded (82.2%). 50.4% of the parents stated that they trusted the PED, and 52.7% stated that they were satisfied with the PED. More than half of the parents (61.8%) stated that they did not visit their family health centre before visiting the PED. 10.8% of parents reported that they had never visited a family health centre in the last year. Majority of parents (62.7%) stated that they will visit the PED again if their children have the same health problems in the future.
conclusionImproving the use of family health centres, introducing out-of-hours services, and enhancing parents' health literacy could shift non-urgent visits from PEDs to primary care settings. In addition, making parents more aware of services provided in family health centres could affect parents' health-seeking behaviours and choose to use their GP rather than PED for their children with non-urgent conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.