ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024
An explainable and supervised machine learning model for prediction of red blood cell transfusion in patients during hip fracture surgery.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review of the influence of anaemia on the effect of total hip arthroplasty, and the prognosis of patients: recent advances and future directions.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for predicting perioperative anaesthetic complications and supporting clinical decision-making: a scoping review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Perioperative Anemia and Transfusion Management in Older Adults with Osteoporotic Hip Fractures: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Emerging Strategies.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Intraoperative Blood Transfusion in Partial Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Optimal model for predicting intraoperative blood transfusion in elective surgery patients: a comparative study of eight machine learning methods.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe study aimed to develop a predictive model with machine learning (ML) algorithm, to predict and manage the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion during hip fracture surgery.
methodsData of 2785 cases that underwent hip fracture surgery from April 2016 to May 2022 were collected, covering demographics, medical history and comorbidities, type of surgery and preoperative laboratory results. The primary outcome was the intraoperative RBC transfusion. The predicting performance of six algorithms were respectively evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) package was applied to interpret the Random Forest (RF) model. Data from 122 patients at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were collected for external validation.
results1417 patients (50.88%) were diagnosed with preoperative anemia (POA) and 209 patients (7.5%) received intraoperative RBC transfusion. Longer estimated duration of surgery, POA, older age, hypoproteinemia, and surgery of internal fixation were revealed as the top 5 important variables contributing to intraoperative RBC transfusion. Among the six ML models, the RF model performed the best, which achieved the highest AUC (0.887, CI 0.838 to 0.926) in the internal validation set. Further, it achieved a comparable AUC of 0.834(0.75, 0.911) in the external validation set.
conclusionOur study firstly demonstrated that the RF model with 10 common variables might predict intraoperative RBC transfusion in hip fracture patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.