Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702003›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Multivariate filter methods for feature selection with the

Nicolas Ngo, Pierre Michel, Roch Giorgi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolas NgoAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Économiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France. nicolas.NGO@univ-amu.fr.
Pierre Michel *Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, AMSE, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, Marseille, France.
Roch Giorgi *Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Hop Timone, BioSTIC, Marseille, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-EURE-0020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe

methodsWe assessed the performance of our new methodology through a simulation study, comparing them against more conventional methods. Classification performance indicators, number of selected features, stability and execution time were used to evaluate the performance of the methods. We also evaluated how well the proposed methodology selected relevant features for the detection of atrial fibrillation, which is a cardiac arrhythmia.

resultsWe found that in the simulation study as well as the detection of AF task, our methods were able to select informative features and maintain a good level of predictive performance; however in a case of strong correlation and large datasets, the

conclusionsResults highlighted a good combination of both the forward search direction and the

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAtrial FibrillationComputer SimulationHumansMultivariate AnalysisAtrial fibrillationClassificationFeature selection

Identifiers

PMID39702003
PMCPMC11657396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.