Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702000›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2024

Dose-volume predictors of cardiac adverse events after high-dose thoracic radiation therapy for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Médéa Locquet, Sophie Jacob, Xavier Geets, Charlotte Beaudart

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation after thoracic radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Médéa LocquetDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, (NARILIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium. medea.locquet@gmail.com.
Sophie JacobLaboratory of Epidemiology (LEPID), Institut de Radioprotection Et de Sureté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France.
Xavier GeetsRadiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, MIRO Lab. IREC - UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Charlotte BeaudartDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, (NARILIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality and may require high-dose thoracic radiation therapy (RT). However, RT significantly increases the risk of radiation-induced cardiac events, such as pericarditis, cardiomyopathy, and ischemic heart diseases. Despite evidence from clinical trials showing that higher RT doses are associated with poorer survival outcomes due to these cardiac effects, data on dose-volume predictors of such events in lung cancer remain sparse.

objectiveTo systematically synthesize the incidence of cardiac events following radiation therapy for lung cancer treatment and dose-volume metrics predictors of radiation therapy-induced cardiac events in lung cancer treatment.

methodsThis systematic review, registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024565103), adhered to PRISMA guidelines to investigate cardiac events and its dose-volume predictors following high-dose radiation therapy in adults with lung cancer. Data were extracted from longitudinal observational studies and randomized controlled trials. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase, with studies selected based on predefined criteria, focusing on clinical cardiac outcomes. Data extraction followed CHARMS guidelines, and study quality was reported using the PROBAST tool. Results were synthesized narratively, with meta-analyses performed where appropriate using R software to estimate pooled effect sizes, heterogeneity, and publication bias.

resultsThe systematic review included 21 studies and identified a significant association between high-dose thoracic radiation therapy (RT) and an increased incidence of cardiac adverse events in lung cancer patients. The review revealed that higher dose-volume parameters, notably higher mean heart doses (MHD), were predictive of major cardiac events such as pericardial effusion, arrhythmias, and acute coronary syndrome. The meta-analysis showed a significant 4% (95% confidence interval: 3%-6%) increased probability of the occurrence of cardiac events per additional Gray of MHD, with low heterogeneity among studies (I

conclusionThis study underscores the importance of dose-volume parameters as predictors of cardiac adverse events following high-dose thoracic RT in lung cancer treatment. The findings highlight the need for careful consideration of heart dose constraints in RT planning to mitigate the risk of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity, thereby improving the therapeutic ratio for lung cancer patients. Future research should focus on refining these dose constraints and exploring cardioprotective strategies during lung cancer radiotherapy.

Indexed as

CardiotoxicityLung NeoplasmsRadiotherapy DosageHumansIncidenceRadiation InjuriesCardiotoxicitiesLung cancerMeta-analysisRadiotherapyReview

Identifiers

PMID39702000
PMCPMC11660733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.