Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39701142›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2025

Lisdexamfetamine in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence: A randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Nadine Ezard, Brendan Clifford, Krista J Siefried, Robert Ali, Adrian Dunlop, Rebecca McKetin, Raimondo Bruno, Andrew Carr, James Ward, Michael Farrell and 10 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Nadine EzardNational Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7495-8305
Brendan CliffordNational Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9178-9013
Krista J SiefriedNational Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-3325
Robert AliFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-8153
Adrian DunlopDrug and Alcohol Clinical Research and Improvement Network, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2394-5966
Rebecca McKetinNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2833-4830
Raimondo BrunoNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6673-833X
Andrew CarrApplied Medical Research, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5730-3625
James WardPoche Centre for Indigenous Health, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2892-4542
Michael FarrellNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-8130
Robert GrahamDrug and Alcohol Clinical Research and Improvement Network, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3401-7199
Paul HaberDrug and Alcohol Clinical Research and Improvement Network, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8915-8872
Dan LubmanTurning Point, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-1937
Mark W DonoghoeClinical Research Unit, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-6443
Nick OlsenMark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7990-3197
Amanda BakerNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3328-7146
Michelle HallDrug and Alcohol Clinical Research and Improvement Network, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5919-2006
Shalini ArunogiriTurning Point, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7667-8868
Nicholas LintzerisDrug and Alcohol Clinical Research and Improvement Network, NSW Health, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-8257
LiMA Investigator Group

Funding

Department of Health, State Government of VictoriaEdith Collins Centre, Royal Prince Alfred HospitalNational Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging DrugsNational Health and Medical Research Council NHMRC APP1109466St Vincent's Curran FoundationSt Vincent's Health Australia's Inclusive Health ProgramUniversity of New South Wales School of Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study tested the efficacy and safety of a 12-week course of lisdexamfetamine in reducing methamphetamine use, an outcome which is associated with improvements in health and wellbeing, in people dependent on methamphetamine. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsThis study was a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial conducted in six specialist outpatient clinics in Adelaide, Melbourne, Newcastle and Sydney, Australia (2018-2021). Participants were164 adults with methamphetamine dependence, reporting at least 14 use days out of the previous 28 days (62% male, 38% female, < 1% other; mean age 39 years).

interventionsParticipants were randomly allocated 1:1 to a 15-week regimen of lisdexamfetamine (1-week induction to 250 mg, 12-week maintenance regimen, 2-week reduction; n = 80) or matched placebo (n = 84), followed-up to Week 19. MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy measure was past 28-day methamphetamine use at Week 13. Safety was assessed by adverse event rates. Secondary measures included methamphetamine use during the 12-week treatment period and treatment satisfaction.

findingsNine randomized participants did not start treatment (five were allocated to lisdexamfetamine and four allocated to placebo) and were excluded from the analyses. Fifty-seven per cent of participants were retained on study medication to primary end-point. There was only weak evidence of a lisdexamfetamine benefit at 13 weeks [adjusted difference in days of methamphetamine use = 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.5 to 5.0; P = 0.49]. However, throughout the whole 12-week treatment maintenance phase, the lisdexamfetamine group had fewer days of methamphetamine use in total (difference = 8.8, 95% CI = 2.7-15.0; P = 0.005). The lisdexamfetamine group reported greater self-reported treatment effectiveness [odds ratio (OR) = 2.89, 95% CI = 1.67-5.02; P < 0.001] and treatment satisfaction (OR = 3.80, 95% CI = 1.93-7.47; P < 0.001). Adverse events with lisdexamfetamine included nausea. Serious adverse events occurred in four (5%) of participants who received lisdexamfetamine.

conclusionsLisdexamfetamine appears to reduce methamphetamine use over a 12-week treatment period, although there is only weak evidence that reduced use is maintained during the last 4 weeks.

Indexed as

Amphetamine-Related DisordersCentral Nervous System StimulantsLisdexamfetamine DimesylateMethamphetamineAdultAustraliaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeCentral Nervous System StimulantsLisdexamfetamine DimesylateMethamphetamineClinical triallisdexamfetaminemethamphetaminemethamphetamine dependencemethamphetamine use disordernon‐abstinence outcomesrandomized controlled trialstimulants

Identifiers

PMID39701142
PMCPMC12128569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.