Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39701090›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2025

A Machine Learning Risk Prediction Model for Gastric Cancer with SHapley Additive exPlanations.

Bomi Park, Chung Ho Kim, Jae Kwan Jun, Mina Suh, Kui Son Choi, Il Ju Choi, Hyun Jin Oh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bomi ParkDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Chung Ho KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Kwan JunNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Mina SuhNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Kui Son ChoiNational Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Il Ju ChoiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Hyun Jin OhDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Funding

National Cancer Center 2111060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGastric cancer (GC) prediction models hold potential for enhancing early detection by enabling the identification of high-risk individuals, facilitating personalized risk-based screening, and optimizing the allocation of healthcare resources. Materials and Methods: In this study, we developed a machine learning-based GC prediction model utilizing data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, encompassing 10,515,949 adults who had not been diagnosed with GC and underwent GC screening during 2013-2014, with a follow-up period of 5 years. The cohort was divided into training and test datasets at an 8:2 ratio, and class imbalance was mitigated through random oversampling.

resultsAmong various models, logistic regression demonstrated the highest predictive performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.708, which was consistent with the AUC obtained in external validation (0.669). Importantly, the outcomes were robust to missing data imputation and variable selection. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm enhanced the explainability of the model, identifying advancing age, being male, Helicobacter pylori infection, current smoking, and a family history of GC as key predictors of elevated risk.

conclusionThis predictive model could significantly contribute to the early identification of individuals at elevated risk for GC, thereby enabling the implementation of targeted preventive strategies. Furthermore, the integration of noninvasive and cost-effective predictors enhances the clinical utility of the model, supporting its potential application in routine healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Machine LearningStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHelicobacter InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveMachine learningPrediction modelSHapley Additive exPlanationsStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39701090
PMCPMC12263238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.