Observational studyCerebrovascular diseases extra2025
Outcomes of Symptomatic Intracranial Large Artery Stenoses: A Prospective Cohort Study from the Asian Registry of Intracranial Atherosclerosis.
Observational study in Cerebrovascular diseases extra, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardising the diagnosis and imaging of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in Asia: a call for regional consensus.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2026Article
- Progress in research on the association between glucose metabolism disorders and intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Imaging Markers Predict the Short-Term and Long-Term Stroke Recurrence in Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntracranial large artery atherosclerosis (ICAS) is a common cause of stroke in Asia. Prior epidemiological publications on ICAS have largely been single-country reports. This collaborative study involving several Asian countries aims to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with stroke attributable to ICAS.
methodsThis is an international, multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study of patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke secondary to ICAS to stroke centers in six Asian countries. Stroke due to ICAS was diagnosed when there was a ≥50% intracranial large artery stenosis ipslateral to a non-lacunar infarct, without significant ipsilateral extracranial stenosis, cardiac cause or other mechanism found for the stroke. Data were collected on patient demographics, vascular risk factors, stroke location, and severity. Outcomes of interest were stroke recurrence and mortality at 12-month follow-up.
resultsA total of 356 patients were recruited. Mean age was 62.7 ± 13.8 years, and 39.9% were females. Mean NIHSS on admission was 9 ± 8, with majority of patients having mild (39.3%) or moderate (37.9%) strokes. Stroke recurrence was 6.7% (95% CI: 4.4-9.9%) while mortality rate was 13.2% (95% CI: 9.9-17.2%) within 1 year. The risk of stroke recurrence was associated with increasing age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04, 95% CI: 1-1.06, p = 0.05) and hypertension (OR: 3.23, 95% CI: 1.09-9.61, p = 0.035). Mortality was associated with age (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.08, p = 0.006) and NIHSS (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.17, p < 0.001).
conclusionsThis multicenter Asian study demonstrates a high risk of stroke recurrence and mortality among patients with acute stroke due to ICAS. They are associated with age (both), as well as hypertension (for recurrence) and NIHSS (for mortality). Better treatment modalities are needed to reduce the frequency of adverse outcomes in symptomatic ICAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.