Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39700499›Full record

ReviewBlood2025

CAR T cells in autoimmunity: game changer or stepping stone?

Dimitrios Mougiakakos, Everett H Meyer, Georg Schett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. [New treatment options for autoimmune bullous diseases].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. CAR-T cells in systemic sclerosis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Machine learning and multi-omics integration identifies immunological predictors and mechanistic insights in autoimmune encephalitis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Effective use of BCMA-targeting bispecific T cell-engaging antibody in treatment-refractory LRP4Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dimitrios MougiakakosDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, and Cell Therapy, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2817-6660
Everett H MeyerCellular Immune Tolerance Program, Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Division, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Georg SchettDepartment of Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has revolutionized the treatment landscape for hematologic malignancies, and emerging evidence suggests their potential in autoimmune diseases (AIDs). This article evaluates the early successes and future implications of B-cell-targeting CAR T-cell therapy in AIDs. Initial applications, particularly in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus, have demonstrated significant and durable clinical remissions, with accompanying evaluation of the immune system suggesting a so-called "reset" of innate inflammation and adaptive autoimmunity. This has generated widespread interest in expanding this therapeutic approach. CAR T cells offer unique advantages over other treatment modalities, including very deep B-cell depletion and unique therapeutic activity within inflamed tissues and associated lymphoid structures. However, the field must address key concerns, including long-term toxicity, particularly the risk of secondary malignancies, and future accessibility given the higher prevalence of AIDs compared with malignancies. Technological advances in cell therapy, such as next-generation CAR T cells, allogeneic off-the-shelf products, and alternative cell types, such as regulatory CAR T cells, are being explored in AIDs to improve efficacy and safety. In addition, bispecific antibodies are emerging as potential alternatives or complements to CAR T cells, potentially offering comparable efficacy without the need for complex logistics, lymphodepletion, and the risk of insertional mutagenesis. As the field evolves, cellular therapists will play a critical role in the multidisciplinary teams managing these complex cases. The transformative potential of CAR T cells in AIDs is undeniable, but careful consideration of safety, efficacy, and implementation is essential as this novel therapeutic approach moves forward.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesAutoimmunityImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID39700499
PMCPMC12782971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.