ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2024
JTIS: enhancing biomedical document-level relation extraction through joint training with intermediate steps.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MetaphorPrompt2-A Structure and Function-Focused Approach for Extracting Causal Events from Biological Text.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomedical Relation Extraction (RE) is central to Biomedical Natural Language Processing and is crucial for various downstream applications. Existing RE challenges in the field of biology have primarily focused on intra-sentential analysis. However, with the rapid increase in the volume of literature and the complexity of relationships between biomedical entities, it often becomes necessary to consider multiple sentences to fully extract the relationship between a pair of entities. Current methods often fail to fully capture the complex semantic structures of information in documents, thereby affecting extraction accuracy. Therefore, unlike traditional RE methods that rely on sentence-level analysis and heuristic rules, our method focuses on extracting entity relationships from biomedical literature titles and abstracts and classifying relations that are novel findings. In our method, a multitask training approach is employed for fine-tuning a Pre-trained Language Model in the field of biology. Based on a broad spectrum of carefully designed tasks, our multitask method not only extracts relations of better quality due to more effective supervision but also achieves a more accurate classification of whether the entity pairs are novel findings. Moreover, by applying a model ensemble method, we further enhance our model's performance. The extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves significant performance improvements, i.e. surpassing the existing baseline by 3.94% in RE and 3.27% in Triplet Novel Typing in F1 score on BioRED, confirming its effectiveness in handling complex biomedical literature RE tasks. Database URL: https://codalab.lisn.upsaclay.fr/competitions/13377#learn_the_details-dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.