Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39700485›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2024

Cosmetic Stature Lengthening: An Investigation Into Sociodemographic Determinants and Public Perceptions.

Ali Lari, Mohammad Alherz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali LariFrom the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, AlRazi National Orthopedic Hospital, Kuwait (Lari); and the Department of Anatomy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland (Alherz).ORCID 0000-0002-2070-6727
Mohammad Alherz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHeight is an important psychosocial indicator, with short stature linked to a poorer quality of life. This study investigates public perceptions and attitudes toward cosmetic stature lengthening, a surgical procedure designed to increase individuals' height without a standard necessity.

methodsUsing a mixed-methods approach, an online general population sample was surveyed using a crowdsourcing platform (Prolific Academic), which facilitates demographically representative samples. Societal influences, personal attitudes, and awareness of the procedure were explored.

resultsOur quantitative analysis revealed a distinct demographic and psychological profile for individuals more inclined toward the procedure, with self-perception of being short, believing height threatens career progression, and being male as notable factors. The primary motivating factor in these individuals was the range of potential height increase, whereas the most common deterrents were potential complications and weight-bearing status. Qualitative findings highlighted themes of negativity toward the procedure, concerns about pain and recovery time, acceptance of personal physical appearance, and empathy toward height-related distress. DISCUSSION: These findings underscore the need for public education, policy considerations, and multidisciplinary patient evaluation processes for cosmetic stature lengthening. Future research should focus on the short- and long-term physical and psychosocial effects to contribute to evidence-based patient education and informed consent.

Indexed as

Body HeightAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPublic OpinionQuality of LifeSelf ConceptSociodemographic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39700485
PMCPMC11659965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.