ArticleJournal of global health2024
Willingness of medical students to work on the COVID-19 frontline during the pandemic in China: A nationwide population-based cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on university performance: a retrospective follow-up study of the University of Split, Croatia.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- The Role of Short-Form Video Apps in Mitigating Occupational Burnout and Enhancing Life Satisfaction Among Healthcare Workers: A Serial Multiple Mediation Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization declared that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) constitutes an international public health emergency, which has strained health resources. In this study, we aimed to understand medical students' willingness to join the workforce fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic and identify factors associated with their decisions. Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study using the Wen-Juan-Xing platform and a pre-designed questionnaire from 23 March to 19 April 2021. We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify the determinants associated with the willingness. Results: Among the 5022 medical students, the majority (n = 4289, 85.40%) expressed willingness to work on the COVID-19 frontline. Logistic regression indicated that medical students' willingness to work on the COVID-19 frontline in China was associated with gender, region, reason for choosing medicine, having medical workers in the family, students whose family members, relatives or friends experienced COVID-19, and professional attitude. Females (odds ratio (OR) = 1.305; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.100-1.549; P = 0.0023), medical students from urban areas (OR = 1.295; 95% CI = 1.089-1.539; P = 0.0034), medical students whose choice of a medical career was their desire (OR = 1.579; 95% CI = 1.290-1.933; P < 0.0001), medical students whose parents or relatives are medical workers (OR = 1.266; 95% CI = 1.066-1.505; P = 0.0073), medical students whose family members, relatives, or friends have never been infected with COVID-19 (OR = 4.567; 95% CI = 3.002-6.947; P < 0.0001), and medical students with undisturbed of professional attitudes (OR = 4.280; 95% CI = 3.241-5.654; P < 0.0001) showed increased willingness to work on the COVID-19 frontline compared with their counterparts. Conclusions: Medical students demonstrated a strong willingness to contribute to COVID-19 work during the pandemic in China. The findings may provide valuable information for emergency management so that policymakers can maintain sufficient health resources and provide quality health care in similar health emergencies in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.