ArticleJournal of proteome research2025
Use and Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques to Discern the Protein Patterns of Autoantibodies Present in Women with and without Breast Pathology.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The treatment of breast cancer in the era of precision medicine.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) has become a global health problem, ranking first in incidence and fifth in mortality in women around the world. Although there are some diagnostic methods for the disease, these are not sufficiently effective and are invasive. In this work, we discriminated between patients without breast pathology (BP), with benign BP, and with BC based on the band patterns obtained from Western blot strip images of the autoantibody response to antigens of the T47D tumor line using and comparing supervised machine learning techniques to have a sensitive and accurate method. When comparing the aforementioned machine learning techniques, it was found that by obtaining a convolutional neural network architecture from a neuroevolution algorithm, it is possible to automatically discriminate with a classification accuracy of 90.67% between patients with cancer and with/without BP. In the case of discrimination between patients with cancer and without BP, a classification accuracy of 96.67% was obtained with the K-NN algorithm and 95.13% with the convolutional neural network obtained using a neuroevolution algorithm, although these results are not statistically significant. It is concluded that the convolutional neural network obtained by neuroevolution is the method with the best performance with respect to those evaluated in this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.