ArticlePloS one2024
Healthcare outcomes and special education eligibility in children with congenital CMV.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCongenital cytomegalovirus disease (cCMV) can have significant sensory and neurodevelopmental sequelae throughout childhood. Many of these sequalae are consistent with special education eligibility, but the special education needs of affected children have not been systematically studied.
methodsRetrospective chart reviews from two cohorts of cCMV children receiving care in a large tertiary care children's hospital were included in this study: a historical research cohort (N = 186, 41% symptomatic at birth) and a contemporary clinical cohort of cCMV patients (N = 112, 68% symptomatic at birth). SNOMED-CT was used to identify ICD-10 codes describing special education-qualifying health outcomes fitting the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) criteria. ICD-10 codes were retrospectively applied to the historical research cohort through manual chart review, whereas the ICD-10 billing codes were extracted from the electronic medical record for all encounters in the contemporary cohort.
resultsOf the 56 unique special education-qualifying ICD-10 codes we identified as pertinent to the IDEA, at least one was noted in 39% of those asymptomatic at birth (AcCMV) as compared to 94% of the patients symptomatic at birth (ScCMV). In the contemporary clinical cohort, at least one of these codes was noted in 67% of the AcCMV patients as compared to 95% for ScCMV patients. 61% of patients in the historical and 86% in the contemporary cohort had at least one special education-qualifying ICD-10 code. Developmental, mobility, physical therapy and hearing-related health outcomes were common in both ScCMV and AcCMV patients.
conclusionsHealth outcomes qualifying for special educational services occur commonly in children with cCMV, including those who are classified as asymptomatic at birth. The emergence of qualifying conditions beyond the neonatal period among these children suggests that continued surveillance of this vulnerable population throughout early childhood may facilitate the timely identification of health outcomes requiring special educational services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.