Trial reportAIDS care2025
Expanding the reach of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among Kenyan adolescent girls and young women: the acceptability of HIV PrEP integration into post-abortal care services.
Trial report in AIDS care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) seeking post-abortal care (PAC) remain at risk of unintended pregnancies and HIV due to infrequent condom use. Integrating HIV prevention services, such as PrEP, into PAC services offers an opportunity to enhance reach, uptake, and efficiency, particularly in high-burden settings like Kenya. However, data on acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability of PAC clinics as entry points for PrEP is limited. A cross-sectional qualitative study, part of a cluster-randomized trial in 14 Kenyan public and private facilities, explored the integration of PrEP delivery for AGYW aged 15-30 within PAC clinics. Using in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews, the study gathered perspectives from AGYW, providers, and implementing partners. Guided by the theoretical framework of acceptability, findings revealed receptiveness for the integration as a timely and effective intervention to expand PrEP reach, enhance access , and reduce stigma. Provider competence, their attitudes towards the integration, and AGYWs' confidence in using PrEP were identified as critical influencers. Essentail operational considerations were staffing, availability of safe spaces, commodity management, and efficient reporting systems. The study highlights the acceptability and scalability of integrating PrEP services into PAC while emphasizing the need for strategies to enhance operational efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.