Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39700015›Full record

ReviewReproduction & fertility2025

Exogenous progesterone supplementation: a strategy to enhance conceptus development in sheep and pigs?

Maria F Tyree, Claire Stenhouse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproduction & fertility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria F Tyree

Funding

Research Training in Physiological Adaptations to StressT32GM154124 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI MARGHERITA T CANTORNA, Kevin John Harvatine · 2024 to 2026
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM154124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: The inability of animals to get pregnant, pregnancy loss and weak or stillborn offspring are significant economic burdens to livestock producers worldwide. Progesterone, the hormone of pregnancy, has a crucial role in the establishment of pregnancy, and it has been suggested that progesterone supplementation may be a promising strategy to improve pregnancy outcomes and conceptus development. This review article describes the existing literature on progesterone supplementation in sheep and pigs in relation to pregnancy outcomes and conceptus development. Lay Summary: Pregnancy loss and weak offspring are significant problems both in humans and in agriculturally relevant species. Progesterone (the hormone of pregnancy) is important for establishing pregnancy and regulating fetal and placental growth, and it is speculated that progesterone supplementation could be a promising method to improve pregnancy outcomes and both fetal and placental growth. This review article describes the existing literature on progesterone supplementation in sheep and pigs in relation to pregnancy outcomes and fetal and placental development.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentFetal DevelopmentProgesteroneAnimalsDietary SupplementsFemalePlacentationPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSheepSwineProgesteroneembryoendocrinology of reproductionfetuspregnancyuterus

Identifiers

PMID39700015
PMCPMC11877642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.