ArticleJAMA network open2024
Evolution in Documented Goals of Care at End of Life for Adolescents and Younger Adults With Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Current status of and factors influencing advance care planning participation among adolescents and young adults with cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2026Pooled it
- The Current State of Palliative Care Research for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Thematic Analysis of Empirical Literature.Psycho-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Differences in Patient and Parent Preferences for Prognostic Communication Across Disease Milestones in Advanced Childhood Cancer.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2025Article
- Proton Beam Therapy and the AYA Sarcoma Patient Journey: Highlighting Needs from Diagnosis to Survivorship.Cancers · 2025Review
- A Call to Action for Revisiting Goals of Care Discussions With Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.JAMA network open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Little is known about the nature of change in goals of care (GOC) over time among adolescents and younger adult (AYA) patients aged 12 to 39 years with cancer near the end of life. Understanding how GOC evolve may guide clinicians in supporting AYA patients in making end-of-life decisions. Objective: To assess frequency, timing, and evolution of documented GOC among AYA patients with cancer in the last 90 days of life. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included a retrospective review of medical records from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, and Kaiser Permanente Southern California of AYA patients with cancer who were 12 to 39 years of age at death and who died between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. Exposures: Stage IV cancer or stage I-III cancer with new metastasis or recurrence. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was documented GOC discussions, categorized by timing before death as initial (>60 days), middle (31-60 days), or late (≤30 days). Goals were classified as palliative, nonpalliative, undecided, or not discussed. Subgroup analysis according to race and ethnicity were also performed. Results: Among 1929 AYA patients with a mean (SD) age at cancer diagnosis of 28 (8) years, 1049 (54.5%) were female; 5 (0.3%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 227 (11.8%) were Asian, 157 (8.1%) were Black or African American, 14 (0.7%) were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 1184 (61.4%) were White, 11 (0.6%) were of more than 1 race, 38 (2.0%) were categorized as other race, 293 (15.2%) were without documented race, 514 (26.6%) were Hispanic or Latino, 762 (39.5%) were not Hispanic or Latino, and 653 (33.9%) had no documented ethnicity. Few AYA patients had palliative goals documented in the initial period (139 [7.2%]), increasing to 331 (17.2%) in the middle period and 1113 (57.7%) in the late period. In total, 393 patients (20.4%) transitioned from documented nonpalliative goals in the initial or middle periods to palliative goals by the late period. Many patients had no documented GOC discussion until close to death (initial, 1364 [70.7%]; middle, 969 [50.2%]; and late, 322 [16.7%]). Among the 1929 patients, non-White patients were disproportionately represented among those not having documented GOC discussions (Black, 30 of 157 [19.1%]; Asian, 45 of 227 [19.8%]; and other or undocumented race, 80 of 361 [22.2%]) compared with White patients (167 of 1184 [14.1%]) (P < .001) as were Hispanic or Latino patients (116 of 514 [22.6%]) compared with non-Hispanic patients (93 of 762 [12.2%]) (P < .001) and individuals with no ethnicity documented (113 of 653 [17.3%]) (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of AYA patients who died of cancer, palliative goals were rarely documented before the last month of life, highlighting the need for timely and ongoing GOC discussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.