Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39699884›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2025

Radiation Myelitis Risk After Hypofractionated Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Christopher B Jackson, Lillian A Boe, Lei Zhang, Aditya Apte, Lisa M Ruppert, Justin M Haseltine, Boris A Mueller, Adam M Schmitt, Jonathan T Yang, W Christopher Newman and 6 more

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) practice patterns for spine metastases in Spain: a national survey by the SRS/SBRT SEOR (Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology) Working Group.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Christopher B JacksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lillian A BoeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Aditya ApteDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lisa M RuppertDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Justin M HaseltineDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Boris A MuellerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Adam M SchmittDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jonathan T YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, New York.
W Christopher NewmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ori BarzilaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Mark H BilskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Yoshiya YamadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Andrew JacksonDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Eric LisDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Daniel S HigginsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases improves symptomatic outcomes and local control compared to conventional radiotherapy. Treatment failure most often occurs within the epidural space, where dose is constrained by the risk of radiation myelitis (RM). Current constraints designed to prevent RM after spine SBRT are derived from limited data. Objective: To characterize the risk of RM after spine SBRT and to update the dosimetric constraints for preventing it. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted in a single tertiary cancer care center with patients treated for spinal metastases from 2014 to 2023. All included participants had undergone spine SBRT, had a minimum of 1-month follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a maximal cord dose to a voxel (Dmax) greater than 0 Gy, and no overlapping prior radiotherapy. In all, 2051 patients received SBRT to 2835 spinal metastases (levels C1-L2) during the study period. Exposures: Three-fraction spine SBRT to a prescription dose of 27 to 36 Gy. Main Outcomes and Measures: RM defined as radiographic evidence of spinal cord injury in the treatment field, classified as grade (G) 1 to G4 or G3 to G4 per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Multiple dosimetric parameters of the true spinal cord structure were assessed for an association with risk of RM to determine the important covariates associated with this toxicity. Results: The analysis included 1423 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.6 [12.9] years; 695 [48.8%] females and 728 [51.1%] males) who received SBRT for 1904 spinal metastases. Among them, 30 cases of RM were identified, 19 of which were classified as G3 to G4. Two years after SBRT, the rate of G1 to G4 RM was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.5%) and the rate of G3 to G4 RM was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.7%). The minimum dose to the 0.1 cm3 of spinal cord receiving the greatest dose (D0.1cc) was the most important covariate on univariable cause-specific hazards regression for RM (for G3 to G4: hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.68-2.72; P < .001). A true cord D0.1cc of 19.1 Gy and Dmax of 20.8 Gy estimated a 1.0% risk (95% CI, 0.3%-1.6% and 0.4%-1.6%, respectively) of G3 to G4 RM 2 years after SBRT. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study indicate that a cord (myelogram or MRI-derived) D0.1cc constraint of 19.1 Gy and a Dmax constraint of 20.8 Gy correspond with a 1.0% risk of G3 to G4 RM at 2 years.

Indexed as

MyelitisRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgerySpinal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39699884
PMCPMC11843358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.