ArticleJAMA oncology2025
Radiation Myelitis Risk After Hypofractionated Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) practice patterns for spine metastases in Spain: a national survey by the SRS/SBRT SEOR (Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology) Working Group.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- The transformative role of SBRT in the management of spinal metastases.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Postoperative Epidural Disease and Local Control After Separation Surgery and Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Vertebral Compression Fracture Following Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- [Neuroregulatory Mechanisms of Lung Cancer Progression and Clinical Treatment Challenges from the Perspective of Cancer Neuroscience].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases in prostate carcinoma - a multicenter cohort analysis.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Lung Cancer and Irradiation Methods Based on Metastatic Site.Cancers · 2025Review
- Reirradiation With Three-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases.Practical radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases improves symptomatic outcomes and local control compared to conventional radiotherapy. Treatment failure most often occurs within the epidural space, where dose is constrained by the risk of radiation myelitis (RM). Current constraints designed to prevent RM after spine SBRT are derived from limited data. Objective: To characterize the risk of RM after spine SBRT and to update the dosimetric constraints for preventing it. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted in a single tertiary cancer care center with patients treated for spinal metastases from 2014 to 2023. All included participants had undergone spine SBRT, had a minimum of 1-month follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a maximal cord dose to a voxel (Dmax) greater than 0 Gy, and no overlapping prior radiotherapy. In all, 2051 patients received SBRT to 2835 spinal metastases (levels C1-L2) during the study period. Exposures: Three-fraction spine SBRT to a prescription dose of 27 to 36 Gy. Main Outcomes and Measures: RM defined as radiographic evidence of spinal cord injury in the treatment field, classified as grade (G) 1 to G4 or G3 to G4 per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Multiple dosimetric parameters of the true spinal cord structure were assessed for an association with risk of RM to determine the important covariates associated with this toxicity. Results: The analysis included 1423 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.6 [12.9] years; 695 [48.8%] females and 728 [51.1%] males) who received SBRT for 1904 spinal metastases. Among them, 30 cases of RM were identified, 19 of which were classified as G3 to G4. Two years after SBRT, the rate of G1 to G4 RM was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.5%) and the rate of G3 to G4 RM was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.7%). The minimum dose to the 0.1 cm3 of spinal cord receiving the greatest dose (D0.1cc) was the most important covariate on univariable cause-specific hazards regression for RM (for G3 to G4: hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.68-2.72; P < .001). A true cord D0.1cc of 19.1 Gy and Dmax of 20.8 Gy estimated a 1.0% risk (95% CI, 0.3%-1.6% and 0.4%-1.6%, respectively) of G3 to G4 RM 2 years after SBRT. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study indicate that a cord (myelogram or MRI-derived) D0.1cc constraint of 19.1 Gy and a Dmax constraint of 20.8 Gy correspond with a 1.0% risk of G3 to G4 RM at 2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.