Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39699829›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Mapping and comparing the quality of life outcomes in childhood and adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: an umbrella review and future directions.

Céline Bolliger, Kirsty Way, Gisela Michel, Samantha C Sodergren, Anne-Sophie Darlington, EORTC Quality of Life Group

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Céline BolligerFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8406-863X
Kirsty WaySchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2287-1398
Gisela MichelFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-0928
Samantha C SodergrenSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8755-146X
Anne-Sophie DarlingtonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. a.darlington@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4387-7278
EORTC Quality of Life Group

Funding

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer ref. 001-2022Palatin Stiftung Nr. 0028/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA cancer diagnosis early in life can leave a legacy in terms of compromised Quality of Life (QoL). There is a lack of clarity regarding the impact on QoL according to age at diagnosis, with childhood cancer survivors (CCS) and adolescents and young adult cancer survivors (AYACS) often combined. As part of an EORTC Quality of Life Group study, this umbrella review aims to (1) identify the QoL outcomes reported in the literature for both CCS and AYACS, and (2) investigate the similarities and differences in QoL challenges between both groups.

methodsA systematic literature search of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted in December 2023 using PubMed, PsychInfo, and CINAHL. Methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR tool.

resultsOverall, 1457 articles were assessed, and 39 systematic reviews and meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. QoL outcomes were categorized into eight QoL domains, all of which were reported in both groups of young survivors. However, reviews on CCS often focused on outcomes relating to emotional functioning, cognitive difficulties, social challenges, school functioning, body image and overall happiness, whereas AYACS reviews had a greater focus on depressive symptoms, outcomes related to sexual health and reproductive health, employment, financial difficulties, self-image and identity and the impact of cancer.

conclusionThis umbrella review comprehensively explores QoL outcomes among CCS and AYACS, revealing both shared and distinct challenges. Future research should focus on developing tailored questionnaires, emphasizing transition periods and incorporating a life perspective to capture unique developmental tasks of young survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAdolescent and young adult cancer survivorsChildhood cancer survivorHealth-related quality of lifePediatric cancerQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID39699829
PMCPMC11919941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.