SynthesisClinical drug investigation2025
Optimizing Individualized Antimicrobial Dosing in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Clinical drug investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Goldilocks zone of optimal antimicrobial stewardship in preterm infants.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and target concentration intervention (TCI) represent significant advancements in individualized medicine, aiming to tailor dosages based on patient-specific characteristics. These approaches account for intra- and inter-individual physiological and clinical variability, with the goal of improving target attainment and clinical remission while reducing treatment failure and adverse effects.
objectivesThe objective is to assess and enhance the current body of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have investigated alternative personalized dosing strategies, such as TDM and TCI, in terms of their efficacy and safety for individualized antimicrobial dosing in pediatric populations. Only studies that compared different dosing regimens and reported plasma concentrations were included in the analysis.
methodsDatabases such as MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until January 3rd, 2024. Only published, peer-reviewed RCTs were considered for inclusion. The study focused on human subjects aged < 18 years who were receiving an antimicrobial drug. The interventions compared experimental dosing versus standard dosing with TDM or TCI. The risk of bias was assessed using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The primary outcome was the attainment of target concentrations, while secondary outcomes included adverse effects, clinical remission, and treatment failure. Data synthesis was performed using the restricted maximum likelihood method, and the risk ratio (RR) was used as the measure of effect size.
resultsOnly 11 TDM-based RCTs were included in the study [experimental vs standard doses: 592 (51.3%) patients vs 563 (48.7%) patients]. Experimental dose was significantly associated with improvement in target attainment (RR 1.2587, OR 1.0717-1.4786; p = 0.0051). However, experimental antimicrobial dose optimization was non-significantly associated with a numerical decrease in treatment failure (RR 0.8966, OR 0.7749-1.0374; p = 0.1424). In addition, it was not significant associated with higher adverse effects [RR 1.3408, odds ratio (OR) 0.1783-10.0825; p = 0.7757] and clinical remission rates (RR 4.0589, OR 0.2494-66.0558; p = 0.3250).
conclusionsThis meta-analysis showed that only target attainment using TDM was significantly improved in pediatric patients treated with experimental doses of antimicrobials compared to standard doses. Larger TCI-focused RCTs are needed to significantly improve treatment failure, adverse effects, and clinical remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39699827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.