ArticleInsights into imaging2024
Deep learning for opportunistic, end-to-end automated assessment of epicardial adipose tissue in pre-interventional, ECG-gated spiral computed tomography.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesRecently, epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) assessed by CT was identified as an independent mortality predictor in patients with various cardiac diseases. Our goal was to develop a deep learning pipeline for robust automatic EAT assessment in CT.
methodsContrast-enhanced ECG-gated cardiac and thoraco-abdominal spiral CT imaging from 1502 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was included. Slice selection at aortic valve (AV)-level and EAT segmentation were performed manually as ground truth. For slice extraction, two approaches were compared: A regression model with a 2D convolutional neural network (CNN) and a 3D CNN utilizing reinforcement learning (RL). Performance evaluation was based on mean absolute z-deviation to the manually selected AV-level (Δz). For tissue segmentation, a 2D U-Net was trained on single-slice images at AV-level and compared to the open-source body and organ analysis (BOA) framework using Dice score. Superior methods were selected for end-to-end evaluation, where mean absolute difference (MAD) of EAT area and tissue density were compared. 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed for all metrics.
resultsSlice extraction using RL was slightly more precise (Δz: RL 1.8 mm (95% CI: [1.6, 2.0]), 2D CNN 2.0 mm (95% CI: [1.8, 2.3])). For EAT segmentation at AV-level, the 2D U-Net outperformed BOA significantly (Dice score: 2D U-Net 91.3% (95% CI: [90.7, 91.8]), BOA 85.6% (95% CI: [84.7, 86.5])). The end-to-end evaluation revealed high agreement between automatic and manual measurements of EAT (MAD area: 1.1 cm
conclusionsWe propose a method for robust automatic EAT assessment in spiral CT scans enabling opportunistic evaluation in clinical routine. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Since inflammatory changes in epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) are associated with an increased risk of cardiac diseases, automated evaluation can serve as a basis for developing automated cardiac risk assessment tools, which are essential for efficient, large-scale assessment in opportunistic settings. KEY POINTS: Deep learning methods for automatic assessment of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) have great potential. A 2-step approach with slice extraction and tissue segmentation enables robust automated evaluation of EAT. End-to-end automation enables large-scale research on the value of EAT for outcome analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.