ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2024
Sinus laser therapy versus Karydakis flap procedure in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative analysis of intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcome.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Karydakis Versus Limberg Flap in Primary Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Functional Recovery.World journal of surgery · 2026Observational
- Combined laser ablation and pit excision for pilonidal sinus: effectiveness, quality of recovery, and patient-reported outcomes.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluation of laser ablation for recurrent pilonidal sinus disease: treatment success, recurrence rates, and patient outcomes.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the utility of minimally invasive sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) versus flap surgery (Karydakis flap procedure) in terms of intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcome in patients with pilonidal sinus disease (PSD).
methodsA total of 106 patients with PSD (mean ± SD age: 26.4 ± 7.0 years, 86.8% male) treated with Karydakis flap procedure (KF group; n = 63) or sinus laser therapy (SiLaT group; n = 43) were included in this retrospective study. Data on patient demographics, operative characteristics (number of openings, length of sinus tract, and operative time), and postoperative outcome including postoperative (day 1) pain intensity-visual analog scale (VAS) scores, time to return to work after surgery (days), complication rate, and recurrence rate were recorded in each patient and compared between KF and SiLaT groups.
resultsThe SiLaT versus KF procedure was associated with significantly shorter operative time [median (min-max) 17 (12-28) versus 27 (20-44) min, p = 0.001], lower pain scores [3 (1-4) versus 5 (3-7), p = 0.001], and earlier return to work [1 (1-3) versus 10 (5-20) days, p = 0.001]. Although no significant difference was noted in complication and recurrence rates between the KF and SiLaT groups, 6.3% (wound infection only) and 3.2% of patients in the KF group but none of the patients in the SiLaT group developed complication and recurrence, respectively.
conclusionsSiLaT seems to be a promising minimally invasive technique for the management of PSD, being comparable to the KF procedure in terms of complications and recurrence, along with added advantages of shorter operative time, reduced postoperative pain, and earlier return to work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39699772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.