ArticleHealth economics review2024
An analysis of factors influencing technical efficiency of health expenditures in China.
Article in Health economics review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathways to promote the performance of healthcare financial expenditure from an audit perspective: Evidence from Hunan Province.PloS one · 2026Article
- Efficiency analysis of primary health care resources: DEA and Tobit regression evidence from village clinics in Jiangsu Province.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
China's primary healthcare (PHC) system, together with rural healthcare services, remains the Achilles' heel in the national healthcare system. Healthcare workers, specifically village doctors, are an integral part of the healthcare system. Using the two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Tobit regression analysis, this study aims to investigate the efficiency of healthcare expenditures on medical resources and services in China, as well as determine how different types of healthcare work influence efficiency. Compared with other types of healthcare workers, village doctors exerted a prominent impact on provincial and rural efficiency at all stages and played a key role in augmenting the efficiency of healthcare expenditures on health outcomes. Besides, township health centers (THCs) and village clinics (VCs) faced administrative overstaffing, mainly involving pharmacists, other nonmedical technologists, and health administrators, which adversely affected the efficiency of healthcare expenditures. This study suggests that the higher the proportion of these non-village doctor positions (e.g., pharmacists, health administrators, and nonmedical technologists) in THCs and VCs, the lower the efficiency of China's PHC system. Overall, the priority should be enhancing the training and remuneration of village doctors and other healthcare workers in rural areas to further enhance their performance and increase the overall efficiency of China's healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.