SynthesisEuropean radiology2025
Comparative effectiveness of four techniques for identifying vertebral fragility fractures among elderly patients.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trabecular texture and paraspinal muscle characteristics for prediction of first vertebral fracture: a QCT analysis from the AGES cohort.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Regional variations and spatial heterogeneity of lumbar CT attenuation are associated with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe incidence of vertebral fragile fractures peaked among the elderly population, and identifying individuals at high risk of vertebral fractures and promptly instituting preventions are of critical importance. This study aims to determine the efficacy and values of Hounsfield unit (HU) values, vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores, bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) to discriminate between patients with and without vertebral fractures.
methodsA thorough search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wan Fang Database to identify potential studies that met the eligibility criteria. Studies that evaluated the utility of HU values, VBQ scores, QCT-measured BMD, and DXA-measured BMD in discriminating vertebral fractures were qualified.
resultsThe combined results showed that there were significant differences in HU values, VBQ scores, QCT-measured BMD, and DXA-measured BMD between the fracture and non-fracture groups. Moreover, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of HU values were 0.82, 0.67, and 0.76, respectively; the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of VBQ scores were 0.70, 0.75, and 0.78; the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of QCT-measured BMD were 0.85, 0.76 and 0.88.
conclusionAll four methods, namely HU values, VBQ scores, QCT-measured BMD, and DXA-measured BMD can effectively distinguish between patients with and without vertebral fragile fractures. Among these, QCT-measured BMD exhibited a relatively high efficacy in discriminating vertebral fractures. VBQ scores and HU values demonstrated comparable efficacy for discriminating vertebral fractures among elderly patients. KEY POINTS: Question Can four different imaging modalities effectively discriminate vertebral fragility fracture status among elderly patients? Findings These methods can effectively distinguish vertebral fractures status among elderly patients, and quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-measured bone mineral density (BMD) exhibited a relatively high efficacy. Clinical relevance The clinical applications of Hounsfield unit values, vertebral bone quality scores, and BMD measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and QCT show promising outcomes in identifying individuals at high risk of vertebral fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39699672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.