Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39699643›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Cue modality modulates interaction between exogenous spatial attention and audiovisual integration.

Aijun Wang, Hong Zhang, Meihua Lu, Jinjin Wang, Xiaoyu Tang, Ming Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aijun Wang *Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China. ajwang@suda.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-3400
Hong Zhang *Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China.
Meihua Lu *Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jinjin WangDepartment of Sports, Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyu TangSchool of Psychology, Liaoning Collaborative Innovation Center of Children and Adolescents Healthy Personality Assessment and Cultivation, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, People's Republic of China. tangyu-2006@163.com.
Ming ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, People's Republic of China. zhangm@nenu.edu.cn.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Team of Humanities and Social Sciences of Soochow University 2022Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI 20K04381Major Program of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu Province 2024SJZD137National Natural Science Foundation of China 31871092Social Sciences in Jiangsu Province 24JYB003Suzhou Science and Technology Development Plan SKY2022113Youth Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Financed by Ministry of Education of China 22YJC190020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exogenous spatial attention attenuates audiovisual integration (AVI). Previous studies on the effects of exogenous spatial attention on AVI have focused on the inhibition of return (IOR) effect induced by visual cues and the facilitation effect induced by auditory cues, but the differences between the effects of exogenous spatial attention (induced by visual and auditory cues) on AVI remain unclear. The present study used the exogenous spatial cue-target paradigm and manipulated cue stimulus modality (visual cue, auditory cue) in two experiments (Experiment 1: facilitation effect; Experiment 2: IOR effect) to examine the effects of exogenous spatial attention (evoked by cues in different modalities) on AVI. The results of Experiment 1 showed that the AVI effect at valid cue locations was significantly lower than that at invalid cue locations in both visual and auditory cue conditions, suggesting that the exogenous spatial facilitation effect evoked by both visual and auditory cues attenuated AVI. Further analysis showed that the facilitation effect induced by visual cues attenuated AVI to a greater extent than that induced by auditory cues. In Experiment 2, the AVI effect was significantly lower at valid cue locations than at invalid cue locations in the visual cue condition, whereas there was no significant difference in AVI effect between valid and invalid cue locations in the auditory cue condition, suggesting that the exogenous spatial IOR effect evoked by visual cues attenuated AVI, while the IOR effect evoked by auditory cues had no significant effect on AVI. Taken together, these results may suggest that exogenous spatial attention induced by visual cues has a greater effect on AVI than that induced by auditory cues.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAttentionAuditory PerceptionCuesPhotic StimulationSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAudiovisual integrationCue-target paradigmExogenous spatial attentionFacilitation effectInhibition of return

Identifiers

PMID39699643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.