Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39699558›Full record

ArticleHealth education research2025

Breastfeeding interventions and programs conducted in the Islamic Republic of Iran: a scoping review.

Patricia J Kelly, Amrita Sidhu, Anusha Sajja, Devanshi Majeethia, Elizabeth Dodge, Basil H Aboul-Enein

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health education research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patricia J KellyCollege of Nursing, Thomas Jefferson University, 901 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Amrita SidhuSchool of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Promotion, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1200 Pressler Street P.O. Box 20186 Houston, Texas, Houston 77225 TX, USA.
Anusha SajjaSchool of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Promotion, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1200 Pressler Street P.O. Box 20186 Houston, Texas, Houston 77225 TX, USA.
Devanshi MajeethiaSchool of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Promotion, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 1200 Pressler Street P.O. Box 20186 Houston, Texas, Houston 77225 TX, USA.
Elizabeth DodgeCollege of Professional Studies, Applied Nutrition Graduate Program, University of New England, 716 Stevens Ave., Portland, ME 04103, USA.
Basil H Aboul-EneinCollege of Arts & Sciences, Health & Society Program, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Rd, North Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4957-2136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to identify interventions promoting breastfeeding (BF), BF practices and their outcomes in Iran. Using the PRISMA-ScR Guidelines, we searched across 14 databases for publications published between 2010 and February 2024 to identify studies published in English or Farsi language in peer-reviewed journals, using search terms 'breastfeeding', 'lactation', 'education', 'promotion', 'intervention' and 'program'. Inclusion criteria included intervention-based studies with quantitative outcomes of pregnant women/mothers receiving education, training or other intervention that promoted BF or exclusive BF. Excluded studies were protocols, those examining Iranian communities outside of Iran publications in other languages, brief communications, gray literature and qualitative studies. After screening for relevance, identified articles that met the inclusion criteria were summarized and tabulated using Rayyan QCRI software. Of the 45 identified studies, 37 used randomized-control trial designs, 20 applied theoretical frameworks or specific counseling techniques. Samples included women pregnant for the first time, mothers of babies born prematurely or with low-birth weight, adolescents, mothers who had very young children at home. Only three studies included family members. BF self-efficacy was the most popular variable to assess, which was examined in 32 studies. Almost all studies showed positive results as a result of intervention. Majority of studies were focused at the individual level. No studies were identified that assessed strategies to change routine care or policies that might facilitate BF. Identifying barriers to moving intervention content into standard of care is an important next step in the development of BF research in Iran.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingHealth PromotionMothersFemaleHumansIranPregnancySelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID39699558
PMCPMC11840716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.