Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39699501›Full record

ArticleBrazilian dental journal2024

Evaluation of the bonding strength of conventional, anatomized, adjustable, and CAD/CAM milled fiberglass posts in weakened endodontically treated roots.

Fillipe Mendes Silva, Pedro Henrique Soares Aguiar, Helena Cristina de Assis, Fabiane Carneiro Lopes-Olhê, Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves, Ricardo Gariba Silva, Antonio Miranda Cruz-Filho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fillipe Mendes SilvaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9652-1967
Pedro Henrique Soares AguiarUniversity of Montes Claros (UNIMONTES), Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2908-9558
Helena Cristina de AssisDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7492-0385
Fabiane Carneiro Lopes-OlhêDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4375-3371
Jardel Francisco Mazzi-ChavesDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9889-1790
Ricardo Gariba SilvaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2568-7999
Antonio Miranda Cruz-FilhoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-9046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the bond strength (BS) of conventional, anatomized, adjustable, and CAD/CAM fiberglass post systems. Forty maxillary canine roots were weakened, endodontically treated, and divided into four groups (n=10). A slice from each of the three sections (cervical, middle, apical) of the root canal was subjected to the push-out test and the failure pattern was subsequently analyzed. The most apical slice was subjected to analysis of the cementation line thickness by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data regarding the BS and cementation line thickness were subjected to the Shapiro-Wilk normality test followed by the variance and Tukey tests. Data failure patterns were expressed as a percentage and submitted to the chi-square test. Conventional fiberglass posts had the lowest BD compared to the other fiberglass posts (p<0.05). All fiberglass posts exhibited a higher percentage of adhesive failures to dentin. The SEM demonstrated a thicker cementation line for the conventional post compared to the other groups (p<0.05), as well as gaps and voids in the cementing material. The anatomized, adjustable, and CAD/CAM milled fiberglass post systems demonstrated a superior BS and adaptation to the root dentin compared to the conventional fiberglass post.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignDental BondingGlassPost and Core TechniqueDental Stress AnalysisHumansMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningTooth, NonvitalTooth Rootfiberglass

Identifiers

PMID39699501
PMCPMC11654010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.