ArticleNeurosurgery2025
Delineating Neurosurgery Resident Development: Insights from a 10-Year National Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones and Learning Trajectories.
Article in Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones assessment system provides a structured framework for evaluating the developmental progression of neurosurgery residents. Understanding the variability in learning trajectories and identifying critical intervention points are essential for refining educational strategies and enhancing training outcomes. In this article, we aim to identify learning trajectories of neurosurgery residents and pinpoint pivotal junctures for potential interventions to aid residents struggling to meet expected competency levels.
methodsWe analyzed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones data from 3541 neurosurgery residents across 124 programs from 2013-2014 to 2022-2023. We examined the reliability of Milestone assessments across programs and addressed potential biases because of program-level differences. Through cluster analysis, we identified distinct learning trajectories, focusing on competency-specific developments and crucial intervention points based on divergences in trajectory.
resultsOur analysis revealed 5 distinct learning trajectories among neurosurgery residents, highlighting diverse developmental pathways. Cluster 1 (n = 1,719, 48.5%) and Cluster 2 (n = 341, 9.6%) demonstrated initial foundational competencies but varied in progression, with Cluster 2 failing to meet the threshold for independent practice by postgraduate year 7 consistently. Cluster 3 (n = 459, 13%), starting with the lowest initial competency levels, surpassed independence thresholds, illustrating the potential for significant growth regardless of initial competency levels. Cluster 4 (n = 520, 14.7%) and Cluster 5 (n = 502, 14.2%) exhibited accelerated competency development, achieving early readiness for independent practice. We found no significant association between cluster membership and program characteristics, suggesting that the trajectories reflect individual variations rather than programmatic differences.
conclusionOur findings highlight the need for educational strategies tailored to residents' unique development paths to support the achievement of competency thresholds. While the data suggest potential benefits of adaptive learning, further exploration is required to confirm its impact on educational outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.