ArticleClinical cardiology2024
Stratification of Early Arrhythmic Risk in Patients Admitted for Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Role of the Machine Learning-Derived "PRAISE Score".
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Reply to "How to Prevent Arrhythmias Following Acute Coronary Syndrome".Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- How to Prevent Arrhythmias Following Acute Coronary Syndrome.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe PRAISE (PRedicting with Artificial Intelligence riSk aftEr acute coronary syndrome) score is a machine learning-based model for predicting 1-year adverse cardiovascular or bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Its role in predicting arrhythmic complications in ACS remains unknown.
methodsAtrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular arrhythmias (VA) were recorded by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring until discharge in a cohort of 365 participants with ACS prospectively enrolled. We considered two separate timeframes for VA occurrence: ≤ 48 and > 48 h. The objective was to evaluate the ability of the PRAISE score to identify ACS patients at higher risk of in-hospital arrhythmic complications.
resultsROC curve analysis indicated a significant association between PRAISE score and risk of both AF (AUC 0.89, p = 0.0001; optimal cut-off 5.77%) and VA (AUC 0.69, p = 0.0001; optimal cut-off 2.17%). Based on these thresholds, high/low AF PRAISE score groups and high/low VA PRAISE score groups were created, respectively. Patients with a high AF PRAISE score more frequently developed in-hospital AF (19% vs. 1%). Multivariate analysis showed a high AF PRAISE score risk as an independent predictor of AF (HR 4.30, p = 0.016). Patients with high VA PRAISE scores more frequently developed in-hospital VA (25% vs. 8% for VA ≤ 48 h; 33% vs. 3% for VA > 48 h). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a high VA PRAISE score risk as an independent predictor of both VA ≤ 48 h (HR 2.48, p = 0.032) and VA > 48 h (HR 4.93, p = 0.014).
conclusionThe PRAISE score has a comprehensive ability to identify with high specificity those patients at risk for arrhythmic events during hospitalization for ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.