Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698988›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2025

Sex differences in olfactory behavior and neurophysiology in Long Evans rats.

Kruthika V Maheshwar, Abigail E Stuart, Leslie M Kay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novelty, Ecological Relevance, and Sexual Receptivity Modulate Neuronal Interactions between the Amygdala and Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kruthika V MaheshwarMaster of Arts Program in the Social Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-3175-0508
Abigail E StuartInstitute for Mind and Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID 0009-0007-1204-6785
Leslie M KayInstitute for Mind and Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-477X

Funding

CRCNS: Dynamical mechanisms of oscillation transitions in the olfactory systemR01DC014367 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CLELAND, THOMAS A, KAY, LESLIE M · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Institute for Mind and Biology Seed Grant, University of ChicagoNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many species, olfactory abilities in females are more acute than those in males. Studies in humans show that women have lower olfactory thresholds and are better able to discriminate and identify odors than men. In mice, odorants elicit faster activation from a larger number of olfactory bulb glomeruli in females than in males. Our study explores sex differences in olfaction in Long Evans rats from a behavioral and electrophysiological perspective. Local field potentials (LFPs) in the olfactory bulb (OB) represent the coordinated activity of bulbar neurons. Olfactory gamma (65-120 Hz) and beta (15-30 Hz) oscillations have been functionally linked to odor perception. Spontaneous and odor-evoked OB LFPs were recorded from awake rats at the same time for 12 days. Odors used included urine of both sexes and monomolecular odorants characterized previously for correlation of volatility with behavior and OB oscillations. Sampling duration in a habituation context, baseline gamma and beta power, and odor-elicited beta and gamma power were analyzed. We find that females sample odorants for a shorter duration than males (just over 1-s difference). Although baseline gamma and beta power do not show significant differences between the two sexes, odor-elicited gamma and beta power in females is significantly lower than in males. Neither sampling duration nor beta and gamma power in females varied systematically with day of estrus. We further verify that variance of these behavioral and physiological measures is not different across sexes, adding to growing evidence that researchers need not be concerned about often-claimed additional variance in female subjects.

Indexed as

Olfactory BulbOlfactory PerceptionSex CharacteristicsSmellAnimalsFemaleGamma RhythmMaleOdorantsRatsRats, Long-Evansbeta oscillationsgamma oscillationsodor habituationolfactory bulbsex differences

Identifiers

PMID39698988
PMCPMC11918302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.