ArticleHuman brain mapping2024
Approximating R1 and R2: A Quantitative Approach to Clinical Weighted MRI.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical and white matter myelination proceed in concert during early infancy.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Functional, Structural, and AI-Based MRI Analysis: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Towards quantitative intensity analysis of conventional T1-weighted images in multiple sclerosis.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- MRI-based human brain atlases of R1, R2, proton density, and myelin volume fraction using synthetic quantitative imaging at 1.5 T.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Cortical and white matter T1w/T2w development proceed in concert during early infancy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Ratio maps of T1w/T2w MRI signal intensity do not improve deep-learning segmentation of pediatric brain tumors.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Weighted MRI images are widely used in clinical as well as open-source neuroimaging databases. Weighted images such as T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and proton density-weighted (T1w, T2w, and PDw, respectively) are used for evaluating the brain's macrostructure; however, their values cannot be used for microstructural analysis, as they lack physical meaning. Quantitative MRI (qMRI) relaxation rate parameters (e.g., R1 and R2) do contain microstructural physical meaning. Nevertheless, qMRI is rarely done in large-scale clinical databases. Currently, the weighted images ratio T1w/T2w is used as a quantifier to approximate the brain's microstructure. In this paper, we test three additional quantifiers that approximate quantitative maps, which can help bring quantitative MRI to the clinic for easy use. Following the signal equations and using simple mathematical operations, we combine the T1w, T2w, and PDw images to estimate the R1 and R2 maps. We find that two of these quantifiers (T1w/PDw and T1w/ln(T2w)) can approximate R1, and that (ln(T2w/PDw)) can approximate R2, in 3 datasets that were tested. We find that this approach also can be applied to T2w scans taken from widely available DTI (Diffusion Tensor Imaging) datasets. We tested these quantifiers on both in vitro phantom and in vivo human datasets. We found that the quantifiers accurately represent the quantitative parameters across datasets. Finally, we tested the quantifiers within a clinical context, and found that they are robust across datasets. Our work provides a simple pipeline to enhance the usability and quantitative accuracy of MRI weighted images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.