Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698753›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2025

Population Dynamics and the Microbiome in a Wild Boreal Mammal: The Snowshoe Hare Cycle and Impacts of Diet, Season and Predation Risk.

Mason R Stothart, Sophia Lavergne, Laura McCaw, Hardeep Singh, Wilfred de Vega, Katherine Amato, Jocelyn Poissant, Rudy Boonstra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mason R StothartFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2863-908X
Sophia LavergneDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura McCawDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hardeep SinghDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Wilfred de VegaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Katherine AmatoDepartment of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2722-9414
Jocelyn PoissantFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Rudy BoonstraDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The North American boreal forest is a massive ecosystem, and its keystone herbivore is the snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus). Hares are exposed to considerable environmental extremes in diet and weather, food availability, and predation risk. Gut microbiomes have been suggested to facilitate adaptive animal responses to environmental change, but severe environmental challenges to homeostasis can also disrupt host-microbiome relationships. To better understand gut microbiome contributions to animal acclimation, we studied the faecal bacterial microbiome of wild hares across two types of extreme environmental change that are integral to their natural history: (1) seasonal transitions between summer and winter, and (2) changes over the ~10 year 'boom-bust' population cycles that are characterised by shifting food resource availability and predation pressure. When compared to summer, hares in winter had lower bacterial richness and were depleted in 20 families (including Oxalobacteraceae and Christensenellaceae) but enriched for Ruminococcaceae (a family which contains plant fibre degrading bacteria) alongside nine other bacterial groups. Marked bacterial microbiome differences also occurred across phases of the population cycle. Bacterial microbiomes were lower in richness and compositionally distinct in the peak compared to the increase or decline phases of the population cycle. Direct measures of host physiology and diet quality (faecal fibre contents) most strongly supported food resource availability as a mechanism underlying phase-based differences in bacterial communities, but faecal fibre contents could not fully account for bacterial microbiome variation across phases.

Indexed as

DietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHaresMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaEcosystemFecesPopulation DynamicsPredatory BehaviorSeasons16S rRNAfood limitationguthealthHPA axisstresswildlife

Identifiers

PMID39698753
PMCPMC11754720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.