ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2025
An integrated machine learning framework for developing and validating a prognostic risk model of gastric cancer based on endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated genes.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Dementia Mechanisms: Identification of Key Oligodendrocyte- Associated Genes through Integrative Bioinformatics and Machine Learning.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Liquid-liquid phase separation in gastric cancer: identifying novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets through gene signature analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC), a prevalent and deadly malignancy, demonstrates poor survival outcomes. Evidence has emerged indicating that disruptions in endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis are significantly implicated in the onset and progression of various oncological conditions. This study was designed to construct a prognostic model based on genes related to endoplasmic reticulum stress(ERS) to predict survival outcomes in patients with GC. Methods: Expression profiling data for GC samples were extracted and analyzed from TCGA-STAD, revealing 214 genes related to endoplasmic reticulum stress that show differential expression when compared with normal gastric tissue. Building on these insights, a prognostic model was formulated using data from TCGA-STAD and validated through subsequent analyses of GEO datasets. The tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion(TIDE) algorithm was applied to determine the susceptibility of individuals in high- and low-risk categories to immunotherapy. The presence of immune and stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment was assessed with the aid of the ESTIMATE algorithm. Sensitivity variations to prevalent anticancer drugs between the risk groups were evaluated using the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer(GDSC) database, and prospective therapeutic agents were confirmed through molecular docking techniques. Results: Thirty-one endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS)-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) crucial for prognosis in GC were pinpointed. These DEGs were then used to construct a prognostic model and were considered as independent prognostic factors for GC patients. This risk model proved to have a good predictive performance for estimating the overall survival of these patients. The patients placed into the high-risk group showed worse results and lower sensitivity to immunotherapy. Moreover, five specific targeted therapy drugs, namely BMS-754807, Dasatinib, JQ1, AZD8055 and SB505124, produced better results in the treatment of the high-risk group of patients. Conclusions: A new molecular prognostic model associated with ERS was established and validated for GC and showed relatively good discriminative and predictive ability. This model greatly expands the collection of weapons in the armoury of prognostic analysis in GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.