Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698729›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Automated and quantitative assessment of aortic root based on cardiac computed tomography angiography using a new deep-learning tool: a comparison study.

He Zou, Yiqiu Jiang, Haorui Huang, Ahmed Elkoumy, Xiaodong Wang, Jinyun Zhu, Youxian Shen, Xinmin Zhang, Mattia Lunadi, Osama Soliman and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Impact of fully-automated AI based CT-analysis on pre-procedural TAVI planning.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

He Zou *Zhejiang-Ireland Joint Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Valvular Heart Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Yiqiu Jiang *Zhejiang-Ireland Joint Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Valvular Heart Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Haorui HuangSchool of the Biomedical Engineering, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Ahmed ElkoumySaolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and CORRIB Core Lab, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Xiaodong WangResearch and Development Department, Suzhou Peixin Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China.
Jinyun ZhuZhejiang-Ireland Joint Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Valvular Heart Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Youxian ShenZhejiang-Ireland Joint Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Valvular Heart Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xinmin ZhangZhejiang-Ireland Joint Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Valvular Heart Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Mattia LunadiDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Osama SolimanSaolta Group, Galway University Hospital, Health Service Executive and CORRIB Core Lab, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Lianpin WuZhejiang-Ireland Joint Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Valvular Heart Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xinlei WuZhejiang-Ireland Joint Laboratory for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Valvular Heart Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of aortic root is crucial for the preprocedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A variety software is emerging for the semiautomated or automated measurements during TAVR planning. This study evaluated a new deep-learning (DL) tool based on cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for fully automatic assessment of aortic root. Methods: The study included 126 patients with CCTA, 63 of whom underwent TAVR. In the overall population, the DL method was compared to manual measurements of the annulus dimensions. Within the TAVR group, the DL method was also compared to 3mensio software-derived aortic root measure, including the annulus, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), sinotubular junction (STJ), ascending aorta (AAo), and the heights of both the coronary ostia. Results: Data were successfully analyzed using the DL method in 122 (96.8%) of patients. The correlation of annular diameters between the DL and manual methods was good to excellent for the overall cohort (n=118; r=0.83), the TAVR group (n=59, r=0.86), and its subgroups [bicuspid aortic valve (BAV): n=12, r=0.74; tricuspid aortic valve (TAV): n=47, r=0.93]. In the comparison of the DL method with 3mensio, the highest correlation was found for AAo (r=0.99). Among the four diameter indices [minimum, maximum, perimeter-derived diameter (pDD), and area-derived diameter (aDD)], excellent correlation was observed for aDD (LVOT: r=0.92; annulus: r=0.89). Conclusions: The DL method offers an effective and efficient tool for the quantification of aortic roots for TAVR planning.

Indexed as

cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA)deep-learning (DL)Quantitative evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39698729
PMCPMC11651967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.