ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Automated and quantitative assessment of aortic root based on cardiac computed tomography angiography using a new deep-learning tool: a comparison study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderate aortic stenosis: diagnostic pitfalls and the role of multimodality imaging in risk stratification and clinical management.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Review
- Impact of fully-automated AI based CT-analysis on pre-procedural TAVI planning.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Intelligent Decision Support for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Machine Learning Spans From Anatomical Assessment to Dynamic Risk Modeling.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical management of aortic valve regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation: prediction, assessment, and treatment strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate assessment of aortic root is crucial for the preprocedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A variety software is emerging for the semiautomated or automated measurements during TAVR planning. This study evaluated a new deep-learning (DL) tool based on cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for fully automatic assessment of aortic root. Methods: The study included 126 patients with CCTA, 63 of whom underwent TAVR. In the overall population, the DL method was compared to manual measurements of the annulus dimensions. Within the TAVR group, the DL method was also compared to 3mensio software-derived aortic root measure, including the annulus, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), sinotubular junction (STJ), ascending aorta (AAo), and the heights of both the coronary ostia. Results: Data were successfully analyzed using the DL method in 122 (96.8%) of patients. The correlation of annular diameters between the DL and manual methods was good to excellent for the overall cohort (n=118; r=0.83), the TAVR group (n=59, r=0.86), and its subgroups [bicuspid aortic valve (BAV): n=12, r=0.74; tricuspid aortic valve (TAV): n=47, r=0.93]. In the comparison of the DL method with 3mensio, the highest correlation was found for AAo (r=0.99). Among the four diameter indices [minimum, maximum, perimeter-derived diameter (pDD), and area-derived diameter (aDD)], excellent correlation was observed for aDD (LVOT: r=0.92; annulus: r=0.89). Conclusions: The DL method offers an effective and efficient tool for the quantification of aortic roots for TAVR planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.