ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Cardiac compressed sensing real-time cine for the assessment of left ventricular function: a large sample size analysis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of artificial intelligence-deep learning-based cine short-axis segmentation and manual post-processing for left ventricular function and structure in cardiac magnetic resonance.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical application of a full free-breathing cardiac MRI protocol: feasibility, efficiency, and diagnostic accuracy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Multiparametric CMR in Myocarditis: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Advances, Prognostic Value, and the Challenge of Genetic Mimics.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Clinical application of free-breathing compressed sensing in cardiac magnetic resonance cine sequences for assessing left ventricular function and strain.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Segmented cine imaging using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence is the gold standard for accurately quantifying cardiac function and myocardial mass. However, this method suffers from inefficient K-space sampling, resulting in long scan times, and requires multiple breath holds that can be difficult for some patients. Real-time compressed sensing (CS) cine reduces image acquisition time through K-space undersampling and iterative reconstruction, enabling rapid magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Further large-scale studies need to be conducted to validate its effectiveness. In this study, we assessed image quality and left ventricular (LV) function during the routine clinical use of CS imaging in cardiovascular MR (CMR) to determine the feasibility of using CS cine. Methods: From April 2022 to March 2023, 242 patients with various heart diseases, including arrhythmia, at outpatient, inpatient, and health examination centers, were consecutively enrolled in this prospective, cross-sectional study and underwent CMR. Two methods [real-time CS cine with free breathing (RTCSCineFB) and conventional breath-hold segmented cine (SegBH)] were used to acquire long- and short-axis cine images of the heart. The total scan time, image quality (Likert score; range, 1-5), LV function parameters, and image fidelity were evaluated for each method. Results: The study cohort comprised 149 men and 75 women with a mean age of 56.2±15.1 years. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) total scan time was significantly shorter for RTCSCineFB than for SegBH (86.44±31.74 Conclusions: CS cine assessed LV function with high diagnostic accuracy and enhanced image stability for individuals with arrhythmia while maintaining strong consistency in two methods for EF grading condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.