ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Validation of intestinal ultrasound scores in assessing endoscopic activity of colonic and small intestinal Crohn's disease in a southwest Chinese cohort: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of the international bowel ultrasound segmental activity score for assessing disease activity in Crohn's disease.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Intestinal Ultrasound for Monitoring Postoperative Crohn's Disease: A Review and Visual Atlas.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2026Review
- Emerging role of intestinal ultrasound in detecting postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease.Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- The Role of Imaging in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: From Diagnosis to Individualized Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recently, intestinal ultrasound (IUS) scores such as International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) and Simple Ultrasound Score for Crohn's Disease (SUS-CD) have been established to evaluate disease activity in Crohn's disease (CD), but these require further external validation. This study thus aimed to compare recent IUS scores in patients with colonic or small intestinal CD in order to objectively assess their value and appropriate application. Methods: This retrospective study consecutively enrolled data of patients with CD from October 2020 to November 2022. The endoscopic and ultrasound images were collected, and the affected segments were rescored according to endoscopic scores [Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD), Rutgeerts score for patients who have undergone surgery, and the Lewis score for CD of the small intestine]; IUS scores were also collected, including the IBUS-SAS, Ultrasound Consolidated Score (UCS), SUS-CD, Simple Ultrasound Score (Simple US Score), and Bowel Ultrasound Score (BUSS). Subsequently, the correlation of IUS scores with endoscopic scores and the identification of disease activity was calculated. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to calculate the correlation of parameters, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare different groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of each score, and corresponding area under the curve (AUC), cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: A total of 203 patients were included in this study. All scores correlated well with endoscopic scores and showed the ability to identify colonic CD activity with high sensitivity and specificity. Among all the scores, IBUS-SAS had the highest value overall and for colonic CD, with sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 91.4% in identifying endoscopic activity and a sensitivity of 95.0% and a specificity of 88.2% in identifying severe endoscopic activity. In small intestinal CD, the UCS showed the highest correlation with endoscopic score, with a relative coefficient of 0.708. The corresponding cutoff values for identifying endoscopic activity and severe activity were also calculated. Conclusions: Consistent with endoscopy, IUS scores are accurate in retrospective activity evaluation of CD, and suitable scores can be chosen according to the given circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.