ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
A literature review of artificial intelligence (AI) for medical image segmentation: from AI and explainable AI to trustworthy AI.
Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Which explainable AI methods in medical imaging are clinically impactful? A systematic literature review addressing the clinician's perspective.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- The Application of the Plan-Do-Check-Act Management Model in Improving the Diagnostic Yield of Autoimmune Gastritis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Observational
- Image-Based Pore Space and Pore Network Characterization: A Review of 2D/3D Workflow in Foods.Journal of food science · 2026Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in paediatric oncology imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Article
- [Lung nodule segmentation method based on multiscale feature interaction and coordinate information].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- Efficient Medical Image Segmentation in Multisensor Imaging: A Survey in the Era of Mamba and Foundation Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- CMT-BUSNet: Adaptive Fusion-Based Triple-Branch Hybrid Architecture for Explainable Breast Ultrasound Tumor Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancements in Developing an Automated Breast Density Detection Technique for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: Synthesizing a Signal-dependent Noise Stochastic Process.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Task complexity and AI dependency among college students: the mediating roles of cognitive load, future anxiety, and task motivation.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- A modern radiologist's guide to artificial intelligence.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Applications of 3D Printing and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Management: A Narrative Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Generating Training Data for Ureter Segmentation Using Dual-Energy CT Two-Material Decomposition.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Hybrid multimodal late fusion frameworks for bvFTD classification in imbalanced dementia datasets.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Towards practical radiopharmaceutical treatment planning: a review of dosimetry simplification techniques.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Intraoperative use of mixed reality (MR) in humans across surgical disciplines: a major review.3D printing in medicine · 2025Article
- New insights into automatic treatment planning for cancer radiotherapy using explainable artificial intelligence.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- A Review of Deep Learning Approaches Based on Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Concordance of an Artificial Intelligence Model (ChatGPT 4.0) with Physician Decisions in Smoking Cessation Clinics: A Comparative Evaluation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Medical image segmentation is a vital aspect of medical image processing, allowing healthcare professionals to conduct precise and comprehensive lesion analyses. Traditional segmentation methods are often labor intensive and influenced by the subjectivity of individual physicians. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed this field by reducing the workload of physicians, and improving the accuracy and efficiency of disease diagnosis. However, conventional AI techniques are not without challenges. Issues such as inexplicability, uncontrollable decision-making processes, and unpredictability can lead to confusion and uncertainty in clinical decision-making. This review explores the evolution of AI in medical image segmentation, focusing on the development and impact of explainable AI (XAI) and trustworthy AI (TAI). Methods: This review synthesizes existing literature on traditional segmentation methods, AI-based approaches, and the transition from conventional AI to XAI and TAI. The review highlights the key principles and advancements in XAI that aim to address the shortcomings of conventional AI by enhancing transparency and interpretability. It further examines how TAI builds on XAI to improve the reliability, safety, and accountability of AI systems in medical image segmentation. Key Content and Findings: XAI has emerged as a solution to the limitations of conventional AI by providing greater transparency and interpretability, allowing healthcare professionals to better understand and trust AI-driven decisions. However, XAI itself faces challenges, including those related to safety, robustness, and value alignment. TAI has been developed to overcome these challenges, offering a more reliable framework for AI applications in medical image segmentation. By integrating the principles of XAI with enhanced safety and dependability, TAI addresses the critical need for TAI systems in clinical settings. Conclusions: TAI presents a promising future for medical image segmentation, combining the benefits of AI with improved reliability and safety. Thus, TAI is a more viable and dependable option for healthcare applications, and could ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes for patients, and advance the field of medical image processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.