Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698635›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Analysis of automatic fetal intracranial volume (ICV) measurement based on the optimized ultrasound Smart ICV method at 16-34 weeks of gestation.

Meng Zhou, Xuelei Li, Ting Huang, Mingli Wang, Antonio Giorgio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meng ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Hefei Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Hefei, China.
Xuelei LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Hefei Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Hefei, China.
Ting HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Hefei Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Hefei, China.
Mingli WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Hefei Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, Hefei, China.
Antonio GiorgioLiver Unit and Interventional Ultrasound Unit, Athena Clinical Institute, Piedimonte Matese (CE), Caserta, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fetal intracranial volume (ICV) can help evaluate the development of the prenatal central nervous system (CNS) from the three-dimensional (3D) attributes of the cranial structure. Accurate and rapid segmentation and calculation of the ICV are clinically significant. Virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) is a commonly used method for measuring fetal ICV. However, its operation is highly complex and time-consuming. This study aimed to optimize the fetal Smart ICV method at 16-19 gestational weeks, verify the consistency of automatic and manual measurement of ICV, and assess an automatic and efficient method for evaluating fetal ICV growth in the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Methods: The ultrasound data of 950 healthy fetuses at 16-34 weeks of gestation were collected. First, the Smart ICV algorithm was optimized at 16-19 weeks. Second, the optimized Smart ICV was compared with the manual VOCAL method. Finally, growth curve and Z-score estimations for fetuses were established for growth assessment via optimized Smart ICV. Results: Compared with the nonoptimized version, the optimized Smart ICV yielded a lower Hausdorff distance (1.15±0.25 Conclusions: The optimized Smart ICV showed excellent accuracy and efficiency in ICV measurements at 16-34 gestational weeks. Our results may help to establish a best-fit growth curve for ICV. Our findings suggest that the optimized Smart ICV method has the potential to be a reliable tool for fetal growth assessment during the second and third trimesters.

Indexed as

Fetal Smart intracranial volume (fetal Smart ICV)manual methodvirtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL)

Identifiers

PMID39698635
PMCPMC11651943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.