ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Challenges in magnetic resonance imaging-based detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in young patients: two alternative approaches.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Addition of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer screening remains controversial issue. Despite the increased utilization of MRI, several studies have revealed its potential suboptimal diagnostic efficacy in young patients. This study aimed to further substantiate the limited diagnostic efficiency of MRI positivity [defined as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores ≥3] among young individuals aged ≤55 years suspected of prostate cancer, and more significantly, to evaluate two proposed approaches. Methods: A total of 2,599 patients (including 207 young patients) who underwent trans-perineal prostate biopsy between January 2019 and May 2023 were included in this study. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square or Fisher exact test, while continuous variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify independent risk factors for young patients, which was then visualized with a nomogram. Results: The positive predictive value of MRI positivity in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer was significantly lower for young patients than for older patients (33.9% Conclusions: The positive rate of MRI positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer was found to be age dependent, exhibiting a significant decline in younger patients. Among young patients suspected of disease, both adjusting the cutoff value and incorporating a model were effective in minimizing unnecessary biopsies. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to validate our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.