ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Optimizing prostate biopsy decision-making for patients with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesions: novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based nomograms.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated segmentation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced free-breathing 3D-GRE: a comparative study of UNet, nnUNet, and UMamba for tumor delineation.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Accuracy, intra-, and inter-radiologist variability of PI-RADS v2.1 scoring for clinically significant prostate cancer detection.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current protocols endorse biopsies for men with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v2.1) scores ≥3. However, the subjective nature of PI-RADS can lead to increased false positives and unnecessary biopsies. Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which quantifies multiple relaxation parameters, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which is the most commonly used quantitative metric, have not yet been combined with a predictive tool. This study aimed to develop and validate novel nomograms using multiparametric MRI, including synthetic MRI, to forecast the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), and to assess the potential of these nomograms to reduce unnecessary biopsies in PI-RADS ≥3 cases. Methods: Between August 2020 and August 2022, 323 patients suspected of PCa were enrolled from two centers (cohort 1: 243; cohort 2: 80). All participants underwent multiparametric MRI, including synthetic MRI, before targeted biopsy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified risk factors for PCa and csPCa. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling, and nomogram performance was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). External validation was performed with cohort 2 data. The impact of the nomograms on biopsy decisions was measured by the avoidance rate and the risk of missed diagnoses. Results: The predictive nomogram for PCa incorporated four risk factors: age, quantitative transverse relaxation time (T2 value) from synthetic MRI, ADC value, and PI-RADS score. The csPCa nomogram included age, ADC value, and PI-RADS score. The nomograms showed high diagnostic accuracy with the area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.916 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.901-0.974] and 0.947 (95% CI: 0.900-0.994) for PCa prediction in training and external datasets, and 0.884 (95% CI: 0.840-0.928) and 0.935 (95% CI: 0.871-0.998) for csPCa. Calibration curves confirmed the accuracy of predictions. DCA indicated that the nomograms possessed significant net benefit. For PCa detection, biopsy strategy combining our nomogram reduced biopsy procedures by 20.2% and 13.8% in the training and external cohorts, respectively, with a PCa miss rate of 4.5% for both cohorts. The csPCa-targeted biopsy strategy also provided clinical benefits, with biopsy avoidance rates of 20.2% and 10.0%, and csPCa miss rates of 4.8% and 1.7% for PI-RADS ≥3 patients in the two cohorts. Conclusions: The nomograms integrating multiparametric MRI and synthetic MRI are highly effective in predicting PCa and csPCa, concurrently, reducing unnecessary biopsies for patients with PI-RADS ≥3 lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.