Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698614›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Optimizing prostate biopsy decision-making for patients with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesions: novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based nomograms.

Yanling Chen, Jinhua Lin, Wenxin Cao, Tiebao Meng, Jian Ling, Zhihua Wen, Lingmin Kong, Long Qian, Yan Guo, Weijing Zhang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yanling Chen *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinhua Lin *Department of Medical Ultrasound, Division of Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenxin Cao *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Tiebao MengDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Jian LingDepartment of Radiology, The Eastern Hospital of The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhihua WenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Lingmin KongDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Long QianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yan GuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Weijing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Huanjun WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current protocols endorse biopsies for men with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v2.1) scores ≥3. However, the subjective nature of PI-RADS can lead to increased false positives and unnecessary biopsies. Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which quantifies multiple relaxation parameters, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which is the most commonly used quantitative metric, have not yet been combined with a predictive tool. This study aimed to develop and validate novel nomograms using multiparametric MRI, including synthetic MRI, to forecast the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), and to assess the potential of these nomograms to reduce unnecessary biopsies in PI-RADS ≥3 cases. Methods: Between August 2020 and August 2022, 323 patients suspected of PCa were enrolled from two centers (cohort 1: 243; cohort 2: 80). All participants underwent multiparametric MRI, including synthetic MRI, before targeted biopsy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified risk factors for PCa and csPCa. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling, and nomogram performance was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). External validation was performed with cohort 2 data. The impact of the nomograms on biopsy decisions was measured by the avoidance rate and the risk of missed diagnoses. Results: The predictive nomogram for PCa incorporated four risk factors: age, quantitative transverse relaxation time (T2 value) from synthetic MRI, ADC value, and PI-RADS score. The csPCa nomogram included age, ADC value, and PI-RADS score. The nomograms showed high diagnostic accuracy with the area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.916 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.901-0.974] and 0.947 (95% CI: 0.900-0.994) for PCa prediction in training and external datasets, and 0.884 (95% CI: 0.840-0.928) and 0.935 (95% CI: 0.871-0.998) for csPCa. Calibration curves confirmed the accuracy of predictions. DCA indicated that the nomograms possessed significant net benefit. For PCa detection, biopsy strategy combining our nomogram reduced biopsy procedures by 20.2% and 13.8% in the training and external cohorts, respectively, with a PCa miss rate of 4.5% for both cohorts. The csPCa-targeted biopsy strategy also provided clinical benefits, with biopsy avoidance rates of 20.2% and 10.0%, and csPCa miss rates of 4.8% and 1.7% for PI-RADS ≥3 patients in the two cohorts. Conclusions: The nomograms integrating multiparametric MRI and synthetic MRI are highly effective in predicting PCa and csPCa, concurrently, reducing unnecessary biopsies for patients with PI-RADS ≥3 lesion.

Indexed as

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (multiparametric MRI)nomogramprostate biopsyprostate cancer (PCa)synthetic resonance imaging (synthetic MRI)

Identifiers

PMID39698614
PMCPMC11651980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.