Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698507›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Enhanced MRI-based brain tumor segmentation and feature extraction using Berkeley wavelet transform and ETCCNN.

Dilip Kumar Gokapay, Sachi Nandan Mohanty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dilip Kumar GokapaySchool of Computer Science & Engineering (SCOPE), VIT-AP University, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Sachi Nandan MohantySchool of Computer Science & Engineering (SCOPE), VIT-AP University, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-0797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Brain tumors are abnormal growths of brain cells that are typically diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which helps to discriminate between malignant and benign tumors. Using MRI image analysis, tumor sites have been identified and classified into four distinct tumor categories: meningioma, glioma, not tumor, and pituitary. If a brain tumor is not detected in its early stages, it could progress to a severe level or cause death. Therefore, to address these issues, the proposed approach uses an efficient classifier based on deep learning for brain tumor detection. Methods: This article describes the classification and detection of brain tumor by an efficient two-channel convolutional neural network. The input image is initially rotated during the augmentation stage. Morphological operations, thresholding, and region filling are then used in the pre-processing stage. The output is then segmented using the Berkeley Wavelet Transform. A two-channel convolutional neural network is used to extract features from segmented objects. In the end, the most effective deep neural network is employed to determine the features of brain tumors. The classifier will utilize the Enhanced Serval Optimization Algorithm to determine the optimal gain parameters. MATLAB serves as the platform of choice for implementing the suggested model. Results: Several performance metrics are calculated to assess the proposed brain tumor detection method, such as accuracy, F measures, kappa, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. The proposed model has a 98.8% detection accuracy for brain tumors. Conclusion: The evaluation shows that the suggested strategy has produced the best results.

Indexed as

Berkeley's wavelet transformationBrain tumor detectiondeep neural networkmorphological operationregion fillingthresholdingtwo channel convolutional neural network

Identifiers

PMID39698507
PMCPMC11653464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.