ArticleMethodsX2024
Methodology for the correction of a CBCT volume from the skull to the natural head position.
Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The orientation of the head during the acquisition of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is crucial for accurate cephalometric measurements. However, involuntary head movements during the scan can result in misaligned images. This study presents a method to correct the natural head position (NHP) in CBCT skull images after acquisition. Initially, slices were reorganized, and volumes were oriented in RAI coordinates. Next, the Yaw angle in the axial plane was estimated using the fronto-zygomatic sutures (FZS). The Roll angle in the coronal plane was estimated using the centroids of the ocular cavities. Finally, the Pitch angle in the sagittal plane was measured (by the Sella Turcica (S) and Nasion (N) as reference points) and adjusted to reference values of 3.8° for males and 4.1° for females. These calculated angles are used to adjust the CBCT volumes, aligning the images with the NHP.•The method corrects misalignment in CBCT skull images due to involuntary head movements, ensuring accurate cephalometric measurements.•Reference points like fronto-zygomatic sutures, ocular cavity centroids, and the Sella-Nasion line were used to adjust head position in all anatomical planes.•The approach aligns CBCT volumes to the NHP after capture, reducing errors in cephalometric analysis and enhancing diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.