Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698478›Full record

ReviewJPRAS open2025

Outcomes of temporalis muscle-based facial reanimation surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhen Yu Wong, Frank W de Jongh, Koen J A O Ingels, Niels van Heerbeek, Sjaak Pouwels

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhen Yu WongDepartment of General Surgery, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Frank W de JonghDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Koen J A O IngelsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Niels van HeerbeekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sjaak PouwelsDepartment of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, NRW, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the encouraging findings of temporalis muscle-based facial reanimation surgery without the need for nerve grafting, there is a need for comprehensive evaluation of the impact of temporalis-based facial reanimation surgery on key outcome measures. Methods: Comprehensive search in Medline and Embase databases were carried out up to 25 February 2023. The articles that examined facial reanimation surgery using the temporalis muscle were included in this study. Postoperative changes in smile excursion and the angle of the mouth while smiling were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Narrative synthesis was conducted for other outcomes including assessments of spontaneous smile, subjective evaluation of facial symmetry using validated rating tools, functional outcomes, aesthetic outcomes and patient-reported outcomes owing to heterogeneity in reporting of the outcomes. Results: Twenty-four studies were included in the analysis. Conflicting evidence was demonstrated regarding emotional smile outcomes and its definition. The pooled changes in smile excursion postsurgery were 7.06 mm (95% CI: 3.73-10.40, P < 0.001; I Conclusion: Overall, temporalis-based facial reanimation surgery is a promising option for addressing the negative effects of facial nerve paralysis on the patients' quality of life. This study highlights the uncertainty surrounding the technique and need for further studies.

Indexed as

Facial palsyFacial reanimation surgeryLabbé procedurePeripheral facial palsyPlastic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39698478
PMCPMC11652750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.