ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2024
Elevating Patient Care With Deep Learning: High-Resolution Cervical Auscultation Signals for Swallowing Kinematic Analysis in Nasogastric Tube Patients.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Cervical Auscultation for Aspiration Detection in Adult Dysphagia: Implications for FEES Prioritization.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Enhancing the assessment of deglutition function in preterm infants with mechano-acoustic analysis and machine learning: a narrative review.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2026Article
- Acoustic and Perceptual Profiles of Swallowing Sounds in Preterm Neonates: A Cross-Sectional Study Cohort.Dysphagia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with nasogastric (NG) tubes require careful monitoring due to the potential impact of the tube on their ability to swallow safely. This study aimed to investigate the utility of high-resolution cervical auscultation (HRCA) signals in assessing swallowing functionality of patients using feeding tubes. HRCA, capturing swallowing vibratory and acoustic signals, has been explored as a surrogate for videofluoroscopy image analysis in previous research. In this study, we analyzed HRCA signals recorded from patients with NG tubes to identify swallowing kinematic events within this group of subjects. Machine learning architectures from prior research endeavors, originally designed for participants without NG tubes, were fine-tuned to accomplish three tasks in the target population: estimating the duration of upper esophageal sphincter opening, estimating the duration of laryngeal vestibule closure, and tracking the hyoid bone. The convolutional recurrent neural network proposed for the first task predicted the onset of upper esophageal sphincter opening and closure for 67.61% and 82.95% of patients, respectively, with an error margin of fewer than three frames. The hybrid model employed for the second task successfully predicted the onset of laryngeal vestibule closure and reopening for 79.62% and 75.80% of patients, respectively, with the same error margin. The stacked recurrent neural network identified hyoid bone position in test frames, achieving a 41.27% overlap with ground-truth outputs. By applying established algorithms to an unseen population, we demonstrated the utility of HRCA signals for swallowing assessment in individuals with NG tubes and showcased the generalizability of algorithms developed in our previous studies. Clinical impact: This study highlights the promise of HRCA signals for assessing swallowing in patients with NG tubes, potentially improving diagnosis, management, and care integration in both clinical and home healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.