ArticleClinical kidney journal2024
Effects of incentivising dialysis facilities on peripheral arterial disease care in patients undergoing haemodialysis: a claims-based cohort study.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review no. 1: designing clinical kidney research using real-world data: research questions, data sources, and analytical skills.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) occurs frequently in patients undergoing dialysis, but early intervention for PAD may not be fully implemented. We evaluated the effects of financially incentivising dialysis facilities that provided early detection and management of PAD on outcomes of PAD care. Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified patients aged 18-74 years who received maintenance haemodialysis between April 2016 and March 2021 from the JMDC Claims Database. The (time-dependent) exposure was claim for incentives for early detection and management of PAD. The outcomes were PAD screening tests (process indicator) and infections, revascularisation procedures, and amputations in the lower extremities (outcome indicators). We used Poisson regression models with generalised estimation equations for the number of screening tests and Cox proportional hazards models for the first incidence of the outcome indicator. Results: Overall, 5850 patients on haemodialysis were identified: 5183 and 667 with and without claims for the incentive, respectively; the numbers of screening tests were 9070 and 776, respectively (adjusted ratio of the frequency, 1.89 [95% confidence interval 1.70-2.10]). Among patients with and without claims for the incentive, infections occurred in 479 and 109 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [0.80-1.23]), revascularisations were performed in 192 and 29 (adjusted HR, 1.11 [0.75-1.66]), and amputations were conducted in 72 and 9 patients, respectively (adjusted HR, 1.35 [0.66-2.75]). Conclusion: The financial incentive for early detection and management of PAD was associated with a higher frequency of PAD screening tests, but not with improved outcome indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.