Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39698301›Full record

ReviewExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids2023

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD): current and emerging technologies.

Britt Hanson, Ben Paternoster, Nikita Povarnitsyn, Elizabeth Scotchman, Lyn Chitty, Natalie Chandler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Britt HansonNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BH, UK.
Ben PaternosterNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BH, UK.
Nikita PovarnitsynNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BH, UK.
Elizabeth ScotchmanNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BH, UK.
Lyn ChittyNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BH, UK.
Natalie ChandlerNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3BH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal testing is important for the early detection and diagnosis of rare genetic conditions with life-changing implications for the patient and their family. Gaining access to the fetal genotype can be achieved using gold-standard invasive sampling methods, such as amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling, but these carry a small risk of miscarriage. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) for select rare monogenic conditions has been in clinical service in England since 2012 and has revolutionised the field of prenatal diagnostics by reducing the number of women undergoing invasive sampling procedures. Fetal-derived genomic material is present in a highly fragmented form amongst the maternal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in circulation, with sequence coverage across the entire fetal genome. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) is the foundation for NIPD, and several technologies have been clinically implemented for the detection of paternally inherited and

Indexed as

Cell-free DNAmonogenic conditionsnon-invasive prenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39698301
PMCPMC11648410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.